# First In Navigation — user reviews

> 9 indexed App Store user reviews of First In Navigation by Joseph Graff, rated 3.50/5 from 13 ratings.

- Source: https://appshunter.io/ios/app/first-in-navigation/id6751251373/reviews
- App overview in markdown: https://appshunter.io/ios/app/first-in-navigation/id6751251373.md
- Rating breakdown: 5★ 5 · 4★ 2 · 3★ 2 · 2★ 2 · 1★ 2

## Most critical reviews (9 lowest-rated)

### 1/5 — Disappointing

*2025-10-16*

Every thing about this app requires a membership.  It’s useless without one, and you can’t even test features due to needing the membership.

### 2/5 — Needs major help

*2026-08-05*

The concept is very cool, the execution is far off. The “multiple choice” answers are no where in the vicinity of the marked territory so it makes it very easy to pick the right one. There is no challenge there. Would be harder if in the answers it picked streets ONLY in the marked district or even better, streets near the destination point to throw you off. Also, if there was a way to just turn off the marked location and route it would make it more challenging to help the user memorize better. Then fill it in as you go. 

Another feature would allow the user to pick a preferred route for given addresses. All territories have them, what an app or GPS might think is the fastest or easiest route is not the best route IRL. 

I love the idea. I hope it gets better.

Sincerely, from a 9 year Chauffeur.

### 2/5 — Paywall

*2025-10-18*

Seems like a cool and useful app, nice layout and tailored to each response category such as fire, ems, police. However, you can do literally anything without paying. Not even demo maps outside of a 3 day trial. Its only $2, but slightly annoying and not something im willing to put the effort in to test.

### 3/5 — Great idea

*2025-12-26*

This app is a great idea, but it doesn’t take into account the nuances of a specific district and no go zones due to traffic, road conditions or traffic control devices. It would be nice to be able to have preferred roads that have less stop signs or less traveled by the public.

### 3/5 — Good Potential, Needs Refinement

*2025-10-30*

Overall I love the idea to help train people with area familiarization. It’s definitely one of the most under looked aspects of 911 response as people will rely on google maps. This will help get them to where they don’t need maps to route them wrong or if it’s down, they know where to go.

Downsides:
1. UI is difficult. Typing in addresses for hospitals has its own keyboard VS apple iphone/ipad keyboard.
2. Takes ages to have an address to pop up in your area that’s not 3,000 miles away. Should be location based.
3. Maybe include the option to drop a pin in selected map area to add address.

I think if this app is refined, it’ll have good potential. As of right now, it’s easier to just drop pins in google maps and self test by studying the area.

### 4/5 — Overall good

*2026-08-24*

Has a lot of potential, great concept. I hope they keep patching the bugs and making it better

### 4/5 — Almost worth the subscription price

*2025-10-21*

The app is a great idea and I think it could be useful for training, but there is one thing that I feel could be improved on. When being quizzed, you are given multiple choice questions for what your next turn will be on the route. Only one of the options is an actual road name in the district. I think it would be more beneficial to have all of the answers choices be roads that are actually in the area, as it makes the correct answer less obvious.

### 5/5 — Great APP

*2025-10-29*

Been using the app for a couple days and I can already tell it's an effective way to learn the roads. I already find myself  being more focused on the road and looking at the GPS less.

### 5/5 — Solid study tool

*2025-10-12*

As a new EMT, I found this app and love it. It has been really helping me learn the roads

---

*Data collected daily from the US App Store and indexed by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/). User reviews are verbatim App Store reviews. Ratings, prices and chart positions refresh continuously; this snapshot is from 2026-09-07.*