# Guess the Military Aircraft — user reviews > 13 indexed App Store user reviews of Guess the Military Aircraft by Alexandru Angelescu, rated 4.40/5 from 43 ratings. - Source: https://appshunter.io/ios/app/guess-the-military-aircraft/id1160288536/reviews - App overview in markdown: https://appshunter.io/ios/app/guess-the-military-aircraft/id1160288536.md - Rating breakdown: 5★ 30 · 4★ 7 · 3★ 2 · 2★ 0 · 1★ 4 ## Most critical reviews (10 lowest-rated) ### 1/5 — Not very good app. *2017-12-03* I hope that other reviewers who have left a negative review of this app go on to receive a message from the app developer in their email inbox as I have calling me mean spirited for leaving a negative review and I and not being singled out and being castigated. My review will not change as a result. Repetitive pictures often appearing in the same "level". No increments in difficulty as you progress up levels just the same repetitions. Use of reporting names in certain aircraft i.e. the Japanese WW2 bomber "Betty" was used by the allied nations not Japan, why not call the Corsair "whispering death" as the Japanese did ? Poorly researched app obviously just using an internet search engine to grab pictures and has copyright been infringed? **Developer response:** Leaving four 1-star and 2-stars reviews on my apps stating that they're a "load of rubbish" or that they're "badly put together" while reporting inaccurate issues (as is the case with this app) and not responding when asked for details, criticising free apps for containing IAPs and implying that users are forced to purchase them to play the game and trying to show off your knowledge ("obviously the person putting the app together knows little or nothing about the subject matter" or "little for those who know anything about WW2 armoured vehicles... Deleted this app after completing it.") is in my opinion mean-spirited. I always respond to reviews that report bugs, features that require attention or ideas for further development. I have improved my apps a lot based on constructive criticism from users. You shouldn't feel annoyed, hurt or singled-out if a developer responds to your reviews asking for clarification on an issue or contradicting you. Each level contains a different aircraft with a different image and difficulty increases as you progress through the game. WW2 Japanese aircraft are presented with Allied reporting names only when there is no Japanese designation available. Using the lesser known alphanumerical model (G4M instead of Betty in your case) would increase the difficulty level too much for most players and could prove tedious. Other Japanese aircraft are presented with their original designation: Hayabusa, Hayate, Hien or Raiden. Poorly researched review. ### 1/5 — Poor advertising... *2016-11-10* The adverts cover up the letters so I can't play the game. If there was ever a good excuse to ban ads in games this would be it. ### 3/5 — Disappointing ! *2021-06-01* After completing all the levels there was no gallery mode at the end . Can you please sort this . **Developer response:** I will investigate the issue and fix it in the next update. Thank you for reporting it! ### 3/5 — Could lead to boredom *2017-09-25* Gets a bit tedious when you have so many levels to attain but featuring so few aircraft, even to the extent of having the same plane in the next picture. Thought it might progress in difficulty as the you completed a level but no, the same old plane get appearing in Level 12 as it did in Level 1 or 4 or 8 blah, blah, blah. Plus there was an error in showing a Typhoon when all you could put in was Tempest to continue - that grated a little. Not all that impressed but some good pictures, thanks!!! **Developer response:** The bug in the Tempest level will be fixed in the next update as soon as possible. With regards to different levels containing the same aircraft with an identical image, please try deleting and reinstalling the app. Each level should contain a different aircraft and therefore a different image. Thank you for your feedback! ### 4/5 — Problem *2021-09-02* pack 5 lvl22 can’t answer it correctly as the letters aren’t correct and has a c instead of a d in the right letters overall good though **Developer response:** The order of the levels is randomly generated. Can you please provide more details, like the aircraft in question? Thank you! ### 4/5 — Excellent test of your combat aircraft knowledge *2019-09-09* This game really blasts out the cobwebs of all that knowledge you have gathered on various aircraft, that you don’t know where it came from! **Developer response:** Thank you! ### 5/5 — Great Educational Time Waster *2024-09-06* This app is perfect for someone that has a interest in military aviation and a long car ride ahead of them **Developer response:** Thank you! ### 5/5 — Wow *2024-06-23* I thought I knew a lot of aircraft, until I down loaded this game **Developer response:** Thank you! ### 5/5 — I love it! *2023-05-29* Its great for getting to know aircraft and now I can identify even more planes! **Developer response:** Thank you! ### 5/5 — Fun Quiz *2018-08-30* Very nerdy, lots of fun for warplane buffs. ## Most praised reviews (3 highest-rated) ### 5/5 — Very Good game *2018-07-30* I highly enjoy this and would like to point something out- the Japanese did NOT call the the corsair the Whispering Death- that was the Bristol Beaufighter ### 5/5 — Absolutely great! *2018-06-01* Great photos and really addictive game. Reminds me of going to air shows with my grandad as a child. Thanks to the developers for giving this to us! ### 5/5 — Accurate *2017-10-01* This app is great for learning the different kinds of military aircraft from past to present. Very nice app --- *Data collected daily from the US App Store and indexed by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/). User reviews are verbatim App Store reviews. Ratings, prices and chart positions refresh continuously; this snapshot is from 2026-09-04.*