# RoughScore — user reviews

> 13 indexed App Store user reviews of RoughScore by TACS Development, rated 2.00/5 from 25 ratings.

- Source: https://appshunter.io/ios/app/roughscore/id6443746591/reviews
- App overview in markdown: https://appshunter.io/ios/app/roughscore/id6443746591.md
- Rating breakdown: 5★ 5 · 4★ 1 · 3★ 0 · 2★ 1 · 1★ 18

## Newest reviews (1 of 13)

### 1/5 — Not accurate

*2022-10-19*

Tested it with some deer I knew the score of one was a 200+ and other less than 120 and it scored the 200+ as less than 110 and the 120 at 160 good idea but needs work

## Most critical reviews (10 lowest-rated)

### 1/5 — Meh

*2026-08-09*

Every single picture of a whitetail it showed the rough score as a 140” every single mule deer I put in was 160” seemed to be very off

### 1/5 — Junk

*2025-10-16*

Litterly says every deer is 140

### 1/5 — 140 it is?

*2025-04-10*

I scored a buck I have hanging on the wall and it scored 140. I thought this was high so I scored a smaller one. 140. I scored a picture of a doe. 140. I had my son hold his hands up to his head as if they were antlers. 140

### 1/5 — Does not work

*2024-11-27*

Every deer, spike or big 10, I put in was rough flavored at 140. 
This must be another rip off wanting you to pay.

### 1/5 — Spike is 140”?

*2023-12-16*

The app really said a 15 inch spike was a 140” deer. You can look at it and see that it’s not close to 20 inch’s

### 1/5 — Useless

*2023-11-28*

I assumed the photo scoring wouldn’t work, and all reviews say it doesn’t, but I only needed the manual scoring. It only scores in whole numbers so it’s useless. A score is in x/8ths so it’s impossible to calculate. The decimal button didn’t even work so couldn’t do it that way either.

### 1/5 — Terrible

*2022-12-07*

Uploaded a picture of a muley buck and it scored it as 140. That was lower than I expected so I used a picture of a muley doe and and a pronghorn buck. All came back 140.

### 1/5 — inaccurate

*2022-11-27*

scores everything @140

### 1/5 — Not even close

*2022-11-11*

I tested this on a picture of a buck that was 150” and it said “110” or lower”, then on a picture of a buck that was 115” and it said “140”.

### 1/5 — Does not work

*2022-11-02*

Tested it with two deer that had a confirmed B&C score and it rated both at 110 or under when they were actually 276 and 180.

## Most praised reviews (2 highest-rated)

### 5/5 — Pretty good

*2023-02-07*

Gave a rough score as expected

### 2/5 — Maybe close

*2023-11-09*

I tested it with a few different bunks on the internet and it was way off. Full frontal pictures with very little interference. I’m going to score my personal buck tomorrow and see how close it was. I’ll update my review if it’s close.

---

*Data collected daily from the US App Store and indexed by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/). User reviews are verbatim App Store reviews. Ratings, prices and chart positions refresh continuously; this snapshot is from 2026-08-22.*