Did not detect reliably
2. Accuracy claims are misleading, given that confidence scores vary, and this score was not very high on an AI abstract I tested. People will falsely assume a 75% confidence score falls within the 95% accuracy threshold.
3. The possibility of false positives is not disclosed, which could lead to overconfidence and unfair penalization of students, if present at all.
No way to attach text, pdf, or doc files on iOS.
Response from developer
Quick note on the numbers since they get conflated a lot. Per-class accuracy on our test set and per-image confidence aren't measuring the same thing. 75% confidence on one image doesn't contradict 95% per-class accuracy. False positive risk is called out in the app itself and on the store page, and PDF or document attachment isn't on the roadmap because the iOS Share Sheet already handles those flows. If you've got a sample you want us to look at, mail support@slopornot.ai and we'll dig in.
Not quite what I thought it was - yet.
Response from developer
You're right, iOS won't let an app scan things while you're inside another app. Apple's privacy rules need an explicit tap to hand content over. For now the quickest route is Share Sheet, then pick Slop Or Not. We're looking at an opt-in Photos auto-scan for a future build. Thanks for keeping the door open, please give it another go when that lands.
False positives
Response from developer
Sorry the first run was a miss. Logos and other hand-made artwork getting flagged is the failure mode we hate most. Since v1.0.4 the classifier has been retrained on a lot more design-tool exports, and there's now an EXIF/XMP shortcut that picks up genuine Adobe and Affinity metadata. If you've got a minute, email one of those logos to support@slopornot.ai. We'll run it through the current model, tell you what actually tripped it, and add it to our test set.
Extremely inaccurate + expensive
Actually useless
If I feed it any of my artwork prior to shading (so it has a lot of spaces that are just a solid colour) it will say my artwork is 99+% AI slop. Additionally feeding it any image that is a single solid colour, such as a screenshot of itself, will say that it is 100% ai generated. I tried generating afew images, locally too for even more obvious samples, all returned as real images.
This app does the opposite of what it is supposed to do and should not be worth your time, especially not worth your monthly subscription to be able to “check” more than 3 images per day. Furthermore, it includes a tool to help disguise AI generated slop which is completely against what the app advertises itself as. Your great grandmother is likely a more reliable tool than this app at detecting AI slop, do not recommend.
Response from developer
Thanks for the careful test. The flat-colour and low-entropy failure you described is real, and we've been chipping away at it. The classifier in v1.0.6 and later was calibrated against more solid-colour reference plates and handles single-fill regions differently, so a flat-colour screenshot shouldn't come back as 99% AI any more. On the Britishizer, that one's there on purpose. The whole point is to show how easy it is to dodge AI-detection tools, so people see where the limits sit. If you ever want to revisit, mail support@slopornot.ai and we'll walk through your samples.
