# 实习僧 vs aTrust

The clearest difference is review sentiment: 实习僧 at 82% against aTrust's 7%. 实习僧 also leads on rating (4.5 vs 1.2) and update cadence (every 3 weeks vs every 2 months). aTrust's advantage is in-app purchases (none vs 4) and ads (none vs shown). On price, device support and iOS requirement there is nothing between them.

Both are free to download. 实习僧 sells 4 one-off in-app purchases. aTrust asks for nothing beyond the download.

实习僧 holds the better App Store score, 4.5 against 1.2. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 126 and 26 respectively. Written reviews point the same way: 82% of 实习僧's written reviews are positive against 7% of aTrust's.

实习僧 ships an update every 3 weeks, aTrust every 2 months. The most recent releases landed on October 15, 2026 and October 14, 2026 respectively.

## The numbers

| Metric | 实习僧 | aTrust |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | **[4.5 (126 ratings)](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/id1064868841/reviews)** | [1.2 (26 ratings)](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/atrust/id1536711104/reviews) |
| Number of ratings | **126** | 26 |
| Positive reviews | **82.2% of reviews** | 6.5% of reviews |
| In-app purchases | Yes | **No** |
| Ads | Yes | **No** |
| Update frequency | **Every 3 weeks** | Every 2 months |
| Monetization | — | Free |
| Size | 216 MB | 125 MB |
| Requires iOS | 14.0 | **13.0** |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad, iPod | iPhone, iPad, iPod |
| Age rating | 9+ | 4+ |
| Developer | [Mshare Network Technology Co., Ltd.](https://appshunter.io/developer/1064868840) | [SANGFOR Technologies Company Limited](https://appshunter.io/developer/434027842) |

## What reviewers say

### 实习僧

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/id1064868841)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases (4)**

| Purchase | Price | Billing |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Python训练营 | $0.99 | one-time |
| 实习僧-39 | $5.99 | one-time |
| 实习僧-49 | $6.99 | one-time |
| 简历优化-基础版 | $14.99 | one-time |

**What reviewers like**

- 👍 Easy to use
- 👍 Reliable and stable
- 👍 Good interface design
- 👍 Fast feedback from HR/companies
- 👍 Wide range of job postings

**What reviewers complain about**

- 🐛 Inconsistent network connection
- 🐛 Slow loading times
- 🐛 App not adapting to iPad screens
- 🐛 Difficulty logging in/changing phone number
- 🐛 Issues with date selection on iPad

**Reported bugs**

- Network connection issues
- Slow loading and response times
- iPad screen adaptation bugs
- Cannot log in with a different phone number
- Cannot confirm or save selected times for resume completion

**Requested features**

- Allow uploading multiple resumes
- Improve search for specific design roles
- Add option to block specific companies
- Increase daily application limit
- Add filtering for holiday internships


### aTrust

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/atrust/id1536711104)

This app provides core security capabilities for digital transformation based on a zero trust architecture. It offers SPA protection, adaptive authentication, and dynamic endpoint environment detection to safeguard enterprises and institutions from complex internal threats.

**Highlights:** Zero trust architecture, SPA protection, Adaptive authentication, Dynamic endpoint detection, App access verification, Permission baselines, Dynamic access control

**Features:** Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


## Frequently asked questions

### Is 实习僧 free?

实习僧 is free to download, with in-app purchases available.

### Is aTrust free?

aTrust is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Which has better reviews, 实习僧 or aTrust?

实习僧 is rated higher. 实习僧 averages 4.5 out of 5 from 126 ratings, while aTrust averages 1.2 from 26 ratings.

### Do 实习僧 or aTrust have ads?

实习僧 shows ads; aTrust does not.

### Which is updated more often, 实习僧 or aTrust?

实习僧 ships an update every 3 weeks, and aTrust every 2 months. Most recently, 实习僧 was updated on October 15, 2026 and aTrust on October 14, 2026.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*