# QR Code Reader vs We

The clearest difference is rating: QR Code Reader at 4.7 against We's 3.7. QR Code Reader also leads on ratings volume (163K vs 3) and review sentiment (85% vs 67%). We's advantage is ads (none vs shown) and monetization model (free vs ad-supported). On price, update cadence, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

QR Code Reader holds the better App Store score, 4.7 against 3.7. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: QR Code Reader has 163K ratings behind it against 3, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews point the same way: 85% of QR Code Reader's written reviews are positive against 67% of We's.

QR Code Reader ships an update every 2 months, We every 6 weeks. The most recent releases landed on November 6, 2026 and November 2, 2026 respectively.

## The numbers

| Metric | QR Code Reader | We |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | **[4.7 (163K ratings)](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/qr-code-reader-quick-scan/id1080558159/reviews)** | [3.7 (3 ratings)](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/we-power/id1182199766/reviews) |
| Number of ratings | **163K** | 3 |
| Positive reviews | **85.5% of reviews** | 66.7% of reviews |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Ads | Yes | **No** |
| Update frequency | Every 2 months | **Every 6 weeks** |
| Monetization | Ad-supported | **Free** |
| Size | 49 MB | 32 MB |
| Requires iOS | **15.0** | 15.6 |
| Devices | **iPhone, iPad, iPod** | iPhone, iPod |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | [Komorebi Inc.](https://appshunter.io/developer/481596469) | [JiangXi LvBu Technology co,. Ltd](https://appshunter.io/developer/1082037276) |

## What reviewers say

### QR Code Reader

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/qr-code-reader-quick-scan/id1080558159)

Scan QR codes and barcodes quickly with your iPhone camera. Access your scan history, scan from photos, and use a flashlight for dark environments. Share your scanned items easily.

**Highlights:** Automatic camera activation, Scan from photo library, Scan history access, Flashlight for low light, Barcode scanning support, Share scan history

**Features:** Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none

**What reviewers like**

- 👍 Friendly and helpful staff
- 🚀 Fast and efficient service
- 💡 Convenient features
- 🤖 Reliable and accurate scanning
- 🌟 Excellent overall experience

**What reviewers complain about**

- 🐛 Occasional scanning issues
- 💰 Concerns about hidden costs
- 📋 Unclear instructions or information

**Reported bugs**

- App crashes or freezes
- Scanning not working as expected

**Requested features**

- Ability to save and organize scanned data
- Integration with other apps or services
- More customization options


### We

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/we-power/id1182199766)

This application connects to a specific brand of powered wheels via Bluetooth. It allows users to monitor wheel status, adjust settings, and update firmware.

**Highlights:** Bluetooth connectivity, Wheel status display, Customizable wheel settings, Firmware upgrades, Device management

**Features:** macOS Compatibility

**In-app purchases:** none


## Frequently asked questions

### Is QR Code Reader free?

QR Code Reader is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Is We free?

We is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Which has better reviews, QR Code Reader or We?

QR Code Reader is rated higher. QR Code Reader averages 4.7 out of 5 from 163K ratings, while We averages 3.7 from 3 ratings.

### Do QR Code Reader or We have ads?

QR Code Reader shows ads; We does not.

### Which is updated more often, QR Code Reader or We?

QR Code Reader ships an update every 2 months, and We every 6 weeks. Most recently, QR Code Reader was updated on November 6, 2026 and We on November 2, 2026.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*