# Acrom vs Otto

The clearest difference is ads: Otto at none against Acrom's shown. Acrom's advantage is iOS requirement (12.2 vs 15.0). On price, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

## The numbers

| Metric | Acrom | Otto |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Ads | Yes | **No** |
| Update frequency | Every 2 months | — |
| Size | 31 MB | 442 MB |
| Requires iOS | **12.2** | 15.0 |
| Devices | **iPhone, iPad, iPod** | iPhone, iPod |
| Age rating | 4+ | 9+ |
| Developer | [Mauricio Carrillo](https://appshunter.io/developer/856715493) | [volkan gumuslu](https://appshunter.io/developer/429893721) |

## What reviewers say

### Acrom

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/acrom/id1256901573)

**In-app purchases:** none


### Otto

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/otto-man/id6805119388)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


## Frequently asked questions

### Is Acrom free?

Acrom is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Is Otto free?

Otto is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Do Acrom or Otto have ads?

Acrom shows ads; Otto does not.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*