# 鲨鱼浏览器 vs 雨见浏览器

The clearest difference is in-app purchases: 雨见浏览器 at none against 鲨鱼浏览器's 10. 雨见浏览器 also leads on ads (none vs shown) and review sentiment (78% vs 69%). 鲨鱼浏览器's advantage is ratings volume (397 vs 14) and iOS requirement (11.0 vs 15.0). On price, rating, update cadence and device support there is nothing between them.

Both are free to download. 鲨鱼浏览器 sells 10 in-app purchases, starting at $0.99 per month. 雨见浏览器 asks for nothing beyond the download.

On the App Store both sit at effectively the same score — 4.4 for 鲨鱼浏览器 against 4.5 for 雨见浏览器. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: 鲨鱼浏览器 has 397 ratings behind it against 14, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews are what separate them: 69% of 鲨鱼浏览器's written reviews are positive against 78% of 雨见浏览器's.

鲨鱼浏览器 ships an update every 4 weeks, 雨见浏览器 every 5 weeks. The most recent releases landed on September 15, 2026 and July 25, 2026 respectively.

## The numbers

| Metric | 鲨鱼浏览器 | 雨见浏览器 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | [4.4 (397 ratings)](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/id1271984698/reviews) | **[4.5 (14 ratings)](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/id6476767964/reviews)** |
| Number of ratings | **397** | 14 |
| Positive reviews | 69.4% of reviews | **77.8% of reviews** |
| In-app purchases | Yes | **No** |
| Ads | Yes | **No** |
| Update frequency | **Every 4 weeks** | Every 5 weeks |
| Size | 161 MB | 174 MB |
| Requires iOS | **11.0** | 15.0 |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad, iPod | iPhone, iPad, iPod |
| Age rating | 17+ | 17+ |
| Developer | [Finger Joint (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd.](https://appshunter.io/developer/1287923149) | [键 金](https://appshunter.io/developer/1727599099) |

## What reviewers say

### 鲨鱼浏览器

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/id1271984698)

**Features:** Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases (10)**

| Purchase | Price | Billing |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 包月订阅8元 | $0.99 | per month |
| 包月续期订阅15元 | $2.49 | per month |
| 连续包月会员20元 | $2.99 | per month |
| 包年订阅会员68元 | $10.49 | per year |
| 包年续期订阅98元 | $14.99 | per year |
| 永久会员6元 | $0.99 | one-time |
| 永久会员18元 | $2.99 | one-time |
| 永久会员25 | $3.99 | one-time |
| 永久会员30元 | $3.99 | one-time |
| 永久会员40元 | $5.99 | one-time |

**What reviewers like**

- 👍 User-friendly and convenient to use
- 🚀 Fast browsing speed
- 🎬 Video playback and downloading capabilities
- 🛡️ Effective ad-blocking features
- 💡 Support for userscripts and extensions

**What reviewers complain about**

- 📺 Excessive advertisements and pop-ups
- 🐛 Frequent video playback freezing/stuttering
- 💰 Aggressive VIP/membership prompts
- 🔄 Performance degradation after updates
- ⚠️ Forced login requirements

**Reported bugs**

- Images display as black/fail to load
- App crashes on newer versions
- GIF files save as static first frame (fixed in recent update)
- Video playback not functioning properly
- Horizontal screen mode not supported

**Requested features**

- YouTube ad-blocking functionality
- Landscape/horizontal screen orientation support
- Resource sniffing capability
- Improved button layout (back, forward, settings, tabs, home)
- Google search engine support


### 雨见浏览器

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/id6476767964)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Apple Wallet, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


## Frequently asked questions

### Is 鲨鱼浏览器 free?

鲨鱼浏览器 is free to download, with in-app purchases available.

### Is 雨见浏览器 free?

雨见浏览器 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Which has better reviews, 鲨鱼浏览器 or 雨见浏览器?

雨见浏览器 is rated higher. 鲨鱼浏览器 averages 4.4 out of 5 from 397 ratings, while 雨见浏览器 averages 4.5 from 14 ratings.

### Do 鲨鱼浏览器 or 雨见浏览器 have ads?

鲨鱼浏览器 shows ads; 雨见浏览器 does not.

### Which is updated more often, 鲨鱼浏览器 or 雨见浏览器?

鲨鱼浏览器 ships an update every 4 weeks, and 雨见浏览器 every 5 weeks. Most recently, 鲨鱼浏览器 was updated on September 15, 2026 and 雨见浏览器 on July 25, 2026.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*