# iPlay vs 甲骨纪

The clearest difference is device support: iPlay at 3 against 甲骨纪's 1. iPlay also leads on iOS requirement (11.0 vs 13.0). On price, ads and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

## The numbers

| Metric | iPlay | 甲骨纪 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Ads | No | No |
| Update frequency | Monthly | — |
| Size | 242 MB | 20 MB |
| Requires iOS | **11.0** | 13.0 |
| Devices | **iPhone, iPad, iPod** | iPad |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | [Lingshi Technology Group Co., Ltd](https://appshunter.io/developer/907005172) | [庆飞 赵](https://appshunter.io/developer/1401363398) |

## What reviewers say

### iPlay

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/iplay/id1324431982)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility

**In-app purchases:** none


### 甲骨纪

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/id1570239443)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility

**In-app purchases:** none


## Frequently asked questions

### Is iPlay free?

iPlay is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Is 甲骨纪 free?

甲骨纪 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Do iPlay or 甲骨纪 have ads?

Neither iPlay nor 甲骨纪 shows ads.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*