# 老黄历万年历 vs 伏羲万年历

The clearest difference is rating: 老黄历万年历 at 4.7 against 伏羲万年历's 4.2. 老黄历万年历 also leads on ads (none vs shown) and review sentiment (93% vs 83%). 伏羲万年历's advantage is device support (4 vs 2). On price, update cadence, in-app purchases and monetization model there is nothing between them.

Both are free to download. 老黄历万年历 sells 5 in-app purchases, starting at $2.99 per month and 伏羲万年历 sells 4 in-app purchases, starting at $0.99 per month. Whichever you choose, the download price is not the number that matters.

老黄历万年历 holds the better App Store score, 4.7 against 4.2. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 52 and 16 respectively. Written reviews point the same way: 93% of 老黄历万年历's written reviews are positive against 83% of 伏羲万年历's.

Both ship on a similar rhythm, roughly monthly. The most recent releases landed on October 26, 2026 and October 25, 2026 respectively.

## The numbers

| Metric | 老黄历万年历 | 伏羲万年历 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | **[4.7 (52 ratings)](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/id1476686022/reviews)** | [4.2 (16 ratings)](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/id6479241385/reviews) |
| Number of ratings | **52** | 16 |
| Positive reviews | **92.8% of reviews** | 82.6% of reviews |
| In-app purchases | Yes | Yes |
| Ads | **No** | Yes |
| Update frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
| Monetization | Freemium | Free with in-app purchases |
| Size | 155 MB | 150 MB |
| Requires iOS | 14.0 | **13.0** |
| Devices | iPhone, iPod | **iPhone, iPad, iPod, Apple Watch** |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | [Guangzhou Shunli Cultural and Creative Industry Co., Ltd.](https://appshunter.io/developer/1484912281) | [Guangzhou Shengqi Network Technology Co.,Ltd.](https://appshunter.io/developer/1673930230) |

## What reviewers say

### 老黄历万年历

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/id1476686022)

This app combines a traditional Chinese almanac with weather forecasts, a notepad, and a compass. It offers daily auspicious and inauspicious times, festival reminders, and a convenient way to schedule your life.

**Highlights:** Traditional Chinese almanac, Weather forecasts, Festival reminders, Note-taking with recurring reminders, Integrated compass

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases (5)**

| Purchase | Price | Billing |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 月度會員 | $2.99 | per month |
| 年度會員 | $9.99 | per year |
| 季度高級會員 | $59.99 | per 3 months |
| 年度高級會員 | $129.99 | per year |
| 永久會員 | $24.99 | one-time |


### 伏羲万年历

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/id6479241385)

This app offers a traditional Chinese calendar experience with a focus on cultural heritage. It features a simulated page-turning effect for the lunar calendar and provides practical tools for daily planning and understanding traditional festivals and solar terms.

**Highlights:** Simulated traditional lunar calendar page-turning, Display of traditional festivals and solar terms, Practical widgets for quick access, Focus on Chinese traditional culture, Modern interface with classic aesthetic

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Apple Watch app, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases (4)**

| Purchase | Price | Billing |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 连续包月 | $0.99 | per month |
| 连续包季 | $2.99 | per 3 months |
| 连续包年 | $9.99 | per year |
| 永久会员 | $29.99 | one-time |


## Frequently asked questions

### Is 老黄历万年历 free?

老黄历万年历 is free to download, with in-app purchases available.

### Is 伏羲万年历 free?

伏羲万年历 is free to download, with in-app purchases available.

### Which has better reviews, 老黄历万年历 or 伏羲万年历?

老黄历万年历 is rated higher. 老黄历万年历 averages 4.7 out of 5 from 52 ratings, while 伏羲万年历 averages 4.2 from 16 ratings.

### Do 老黄历万年历 or 伏羲万年历 have ads?

伏羲万年历 shows ads; 老黄历万年历 does not.

### Which is updated more often, 老黄历万年历 or 伏羲万年历?

老黄历万年历 ships an update monthly, and 伏羲万年历 monthly. Most recently, 老黄历万年历 was updated on October 26, 2026 and 伏羲万年历 on October 25, 2026.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*