# 1966日照 vs 速派呼車

The clearest difference is iOS requirement: 1966日照 at 10.0 against 速派呼車's 12.0. On price, ads, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

## The numbers

| Metric | 1966日照 | 速派呼車 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Ads | No | No |
| Update frequency | Weekly | — |
| Size | 30 MB | 31 MB |
| Requires iOS | **10.0** | 12.0 |
| Devices | iPhone, iPod | iPhone, iPod |
| Age rating | 4+ | 17+ |
| Developer | [DonKeymove Co., Ltd.](https://appshunter.io/developer/1512079935) | [Zhi Kui Network Technology Co., Ltd](https://appshunter.io/developer/493590218) |

## What reviewers say

### 1966日照

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/1966/id1517367610)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility

**In-app purchases:** none


### 速派呼車

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/id6469406834)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


## Frequently asked questions

### Is 1966日照 free?

1966日照 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Is 速派呼車 free?

速派呼車 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Do 1966日照 or 速派呼車 have ads?

Neither 1966日照 nor 速派呼車 shows ads.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*