# METs vs CardioTest

The clearest difference is device support: METs at 2 against CardioTest's —. METs also leads on iOS requirement (11.0 vs 13.0). On price and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

## The numbers

| Metric | METs | CardioTest |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Ads | No | — |
| Update frequency | — | Every 12 months |
| Size | 57 MB | 39 MB |
| Requires iOS | **11.0** | 13.0 |
| Devices | **iPhone, iPod** | — |
| Age rating | 4+ | 17+ |
| Developer | [Activity Lab Inc.](https://appshunter.io/developer/978743876) | [MAUME ROBIN CHARLES FREDERIC](https://appshunter.io/developer/1718440708) |

## What reviewers say

### METs

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/mets-up/id1543396695)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility

**In-app purchases:** none


### CardioTest

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/cardiotest-pro/id6473115154)

**In-app purchases:** none


## Frequently asked questions

### Is METs free?

METs is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Is CardioTest free?

CardioTest is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*