# ATracks vs footprint map

The clearest difference is ads: ATracks at none against footprint map's shown. footprint map's advantage is iOS requirement (14.0 vs 17.6). On price, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

## The numbers

| Metric | ATracks | footprint map |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Ads | **No** | Yes |
| Update frequency | Every 2 weeks | — |
| Size | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Requires iOS | 17.6 | **14.0** |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad | **iPhone, iPad, iPod** |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | [Avanti Applications, LLC](https://appshunter.io/developer/1072162389) | [Kiyohito Ochi](https://appshunter.io/developer/1661127935) |

## What reviewers say

### ATracks

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/atracks/id1619330372)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility

**In-app purchases:** none


### footprint map

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/footprint-map/id1661127933)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility

**In-app purchases:** none


## Frequently asked questions

### Is ATracks free?

ATracks is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Is footprint map free?

footprint map is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Do ATracks or footprint map have ads?

footprint map shows ads; ATracks does not.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*
