# 鸿飞达司机 vs PAM

The clearest difference is ads: PAM at none against 鸿飞达司机's shown. PAM also leads on iOS requirement (11.0 vs 15.6). On price, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

## The numbers

| Metric | 鸿飞达司机 | PAM |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Ads | Yes | **No** |
| Update frequency | Every 2 months | — |
| Size | 136 MB | 16 MB |
| Requires iOS | 15.6 | **11.0** |
| Devices | iPhone, iPod | iPhone, iPod |
| Age rating | 17+ | 4+ |
| Developer | [鸿飞达(天津)供应链有限公司](https://appshunter.io/developer/1781604018) | [iRootech Technology Co., Ltd.](https://appshunter.io/developer/1193516407) |

## What reviewers say

### 鸿飞达司机

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/id1627190180)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


### PAM

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/pam/id6761507067)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


## Frequently asked questions

### Is 鸿飞达司机 free?

鸿飞达司机 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Is PAM free?

PAM is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Do 鸿飞达司机 or PAM have ads?

鸿飞达司机 shows ads; PAM does not.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*