Comparison

Flying Carpet File Transfer vs Wallrap

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Flying Carpet File Transfer

Transfer files directly between devices without needing an internet connection or wireless network. Uses ad hoc WiFi or Bluetooth for close-range transfers across iOS, Android, Linux, and Windows.

Highlights
  • Direct file transfer
  • No internet required
  • Ad hoc WiFi support
  • Bluetooth transfer option
  • Cross-platform compatibility (iOS, Android, Linux, Windows)
Features
Read full description

Send and receive files between iOS, Android, Linux, macOS, and Windows: either over ad hoc WiFi with one device acting as hotspot, or over a network shared by both devices. No internet or cell connection required, just two devices with WiFi or Ethernet chips (and optionally Bluetooth). Other versions available for free at https://flyingcarpet.spiegl.dev.

About

Wallrap

Features
Read full description

Compare two saved acoustic traces position by position to see agreement, disagreement and uncertain taps. HOW IT WORKS 1. Mark at least three positions, calibrate for the wall, and save two traces using the same positions. 2. Open History, tap Compare, select the passes, and confirm matching positions and calibration. 3. Reverse the second pass if needed, inspect each position, and share the comparison. An illustrative example is available. Listen, Trace, calibration and the multi-pass survey composer remain available. The composer now opens from History so it does not cover the bottom navigation. WHAT TO KNOW Repeatability does not prove a stud or a safe mounting point. Acoustic taps cannot identify wiring, pipes or other hidden hazards. Independently verify before drilling. Different trace lengths are rejected; low-confidence taps and edge classifications remain uncertain even when labels match. iPhone and iPad.

Screenshots

Flying Carpet File Transfer1 screens
Wallrap3 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is update cadence: Wallrap at every 10 days against Flying Carpet File Transfer's every 3 months. Flying Carpet File Transfer's advantage is price ($0.99 vs $2.99). On ads, in-app purchases, device support and iOS requirement there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Flying Carpet File Transfer costs $0.99 and Wallrap $2.99 up front. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Flying Carpet File Transfer ships an update every 3 months, Wallrap every 10 days. The most recent releases landed on October 24, 2026 and October 10, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard2 real differences · 8 level
Flying Carpet File Transfer versus Wallrap: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterFlying Carpet File TransferWallrap
Price$0.99 — better$2.99
Rating4.4 (21 ratings) — better—
Positive reviews71.4% of reviews—
Number of ratings21 — better—
Update frequencyEvery 3 monthsEvery 10 days — better
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationPaid—
DevicesiPhone, iPadiPhone, iPad
Requires iOS16.0 — better17.0
Further details — not scored
Size1 MB4 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperTheron SpieglRobert Corbin

In-app purchases

None

Flying Carpet File Transfer

No in-app purchases

None

Wallrap

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is Flying Carpet File Transfer free?
Flying Carpet File Transfer costs $0.99, with no in-app purchases.
Is Wallrap free?
Wallrap costs $2.99, with no in-app purchases.
Do Flying Carpet File Transfer or Wallrap have ads?
Neither Flying Carpet File Transfer nor Wallrap shows ads.
Which is updated more often, Flying Carpet File Transfer or Wallrap?
Flying Carpet File Transfer ships an update every 3 months, and Wallrap every 10 days. Most recently, Flying Carpet File Transfer was updated on October 24, 2026 and Wallrap on October 10, 2026.

Other comparisons