# 把手案例 vs 时光锚

The clearest difference is in-app purchases: 时光锚 at none against 把手案例's 10. 把手案例's advantage is iOS requirement (13.0 vs 16.0). On price, ads and device support there is nothing between them.

Both are free to download. 把手案例 sells 10 one-off in-app purchases. 时光锚 asks for nothing beyond the download.

## The numbers

| Metric | 把手案例 | 时光锚 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| In-app purchases | Yes | **No** |
| Ads | No | No |
| Update frequency | Monthly | — |
| Size | 45 MB | 31 MB |
| Requires iOS | **13.0** | 16.0 |
| Devices | **iPhone, iPod** | iPhone |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | [长春市把手科技有限公司](https://appshunter.io/developer/1665799888) | [慧 李](https://appshunter.io/developer/1794036670) |

## What reviewers say

### 把手案例

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/id1665799886)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases (10)**

| Purchase | Price | Billing |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 测试 | $0.99 | one-time |
| 1月VIP | $9.99 | one-time |
| 1月SVIP | $14.99 | one-time |
| 2年VIP | $99.99 | one-time |
| 2年SVIP | $149.99 | one-time |
| 终身SVIP | $229.99 | one-time |
| 1年初创版团队会员 | $499.99 | one-time |
| 2年初创版团队会员 | $799.99 | one-time |
| 3年初创版团队会员 | $999.99 | one-time |
| 1年旗舰版团队会员 | $999.99 | one-time |


### 时光锚

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/id6760256263)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


## Frequently asked questions

### Is 把手案例 free?

把手案例 is free to download, with in-app purchases available.

### Is 时光锚 free?

时光锚 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Do 把手案例 or 时光锚 have ads?

Neither 把手案例 nor 时光锚 shows ads.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*