# Sing vs PolyBud Polyrhythmic Sequencer

The clearest difference is rating: PolyBud Polyrhythmic Sequencer at 4.9 against Sing's 3.0. PolyBud Polyrhythmic Sequencer also leads on review sentiment (100% vs 63%) and update cadence (every 2 weeks vs every 6 months). Sing's advantage is price ($4.99 vs $5.99). On ads, in-app purchases, monetization model and device support there is nothing between them.

Sing costs $4.99 and PolyBud Polyrhythmic Sequencer $5.99 up front. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

PolyBud Polyrhythmic Sequencer holds the better App Store score, 4.9 against 3.0. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 2 and 9 respectively. Written reviews point the same way: 63% of Sing's written reviews are positive against 100% of PolyBud Polyrhythmic Sequencer's.

Sing ships an update every 6 months, PolyBud Polyrhythmic Sequencer every 2 weeks. The most recent releases landed on October 8, 2026 and October 15, 2026 respectively.

## The numbers

| Metric | Sing | PolyBud Polyrhythmic Sequencer |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | **$4.99** | $5.99 |
| Rating | [3.0 (2 ratings)](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/sing-intuna/id294767812/reviews) | **[4.9 (9 ratings)](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/polybud-polyrhythmic-sequencer/id1624211288/reviews)** |
| Number of ratings | 2 | **9** |
| Positive reviews | 62.5% of reviews | **100.0% of reviews** |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Ads | No | No |
| Update frequency | Every 6 months | **Every 2 weeks** |
| Monetization | Paid | Paid |
| Size | 2 MB | 7 MB |
| Requires iOS | 15.6 | **13.0** |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad, iPod | iPhone, iPad, iPod |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | [HotPaw Productions](https://appshunter.io/developer/285074853) | [Cem Olcay](https://appshunter.io/developer/523633853) |

## What reviewers say

### Sing

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/sing-intuna/id294767812)

Visualize your singing or instrument playing pitch with a color-coded graph. This app analyzes audio input to show if you are on, sharp, or flat, helping you train your ear for accurate intonation.

**Highlights:** Color-coded pitch graph, Real-time audio analysis, Visualizes pitch accuracy, Supports singing and instruments, Pitch frequency spectrum display, Monophonic pitch detection

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


### PolyBud Polyrhythmic Sequencer

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/polybud-polyrhythmic-sequencer/id1624211288)

Create complex musical sequences with multiple polyrhythmic tracks. Control note, velocity, gate, and MIDI CC parameters with independent step lengths and rates. Route MIDI output to your favorite synths and AUv3 hosts.

**Highlights:** Multitrack polyrhythmic MIDI sequencing, Note and MIDI CC tracks, Configurable step lengths per mode, Independent track rates, Assignable MIDI channels, Ramp value for CC smoothing, AUv3 plugin support

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


## Frequently asked questions

### Is Sing free?

Sing costs $4.99, with no in-app purchases.

### Is PolyBud Polyrhythmic Sequencer free?

PolyBud Polyrhythmic Sequencer costs $5.99, with no in-app purchases.

### Which has better reviews, Sing or PolyBud Polyrhythmic Sequencer?

PolyBud Polyrhythmic Sequencer is rated higher. Sing averages 3.0 out of 5 from 2 ratings, while PolyBud Polyrhythmic Sequencer averages 4.9 from 9 ratings.

### Do Sing or PolyBud Polyrhythmic Sequencer have ads?

Neither Sing nor PolyBud Polyrhythmic Sequencer shows ads.

### Which is updated more often, Sing or PolyBud Polyrhythmic Sequencer?

Sing ships an update every 6 months, and PolyBud Polyrhythmic Sequencer every 2 weeks. Most recently, Sing was updated on October 8, 2026 and PolyBud Polyrhythmic Sequencer on October 15, 2026.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*