# 英単2000 vs Med

The clearest difference is device support: Med at 2 against 英単2000's —. 英単2000's advantage is iOS requirement (12.0 vs 16.6). On price and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

## The numbers

| Metric | 英単2000 | Med |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Ads | — | No |
| Update frequency | — | Every 18 months |
| Size | 7 MB | 53 MB |
| Requires iOS | **12.0** | 16.6 |
| Devices | — | **iPhone, iPad** |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | [Jun](https://appshunter.io/developer/330172225) | [丸善雄松堂](https://appshunter.io/developer/1207155434) |

## What reviewers say

### 英単2000

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/2000/id330172222)

**In-app purchases:** none


### Med

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/med-st/id1549162162)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


## Frequently asked questions

### Is 英単2000 free?

英単2000 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Is Med free?

Med is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*