# InField vs Nutrient Deficiencies by Crop

The clearest difference is review sentiment: Nutrient Deficiencies by Crop at 100% against InField's 32%. Nutrient Deficiencies by Crop also leads on rating (4.0 vs 3.3) and iOS requirement (11.0 vs 13.0). InField's advantage is update cadence (every 5 weeks vs every 13 months) and ratings volume (29 vs 4). On price, ads, in-app purchases and monetization model there is nothing between them.

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

Nutrient Deficiencies by Crop holds the better App Store score, 4.0 against 3.3. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: InField has 29 ratings behind it against 4, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews point the same way: 32% of InField's written reviews are positive against 100% of Nutrient Deficiencies by Crop's.

InField ships an update every 5 weeks, Nutrient Deficiencies by Crop every 13 months. The most recent releases landed on November 1, 2026 and November 4, 2026 respectively.

## The numbers

| Metric | InField | Nutrient Deficiencies by Crop |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | [3.3 (29 ratings)](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/infield/id409704374/reviews) | **[4.0 (4 ratings)](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/nutrient-deficiencies-by-crop/id847529160/reviews)** |
| Number of ratings | **29** | 4 |
| Positive reviews | 32.0% of reviews | **100.0% of reviews** |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Ads | No | No |
| Update frequency | **Every 5 weeks** | Every 13 months |
| Monetization | Free | Free |
| Size | 62 MB | 31 MB |
| Requires iOS | 13.0 | **11.0** |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad, iPod | iPhone, iPad, iPod |
| Age rating | 9+ | +4 |
| Developer | [InField.ag LLC](https://appshunter.io/developer/1567447405) | [Ag PhD](https://appshunter.io/developer/520210329) |

## What reviewers say

### InField

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/infield/id409704374)

This mobile farm management app connects farmers with their teams and a network for real-time data sharing. It offers tools for communication, accessing important agricultural documents, and managing crop-specific information and timelines.

**Highlights:** Real-time in-field data sharing, Direct messaging with connections, Input label and SDS lookup, Crop-specific details and rates, Preharvest and interval timelines, Organic product search, Offline record access

**Features:** macOS Compatibility

**In-app purchases:** none


### Nutrient Deficiencies by Crop

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/nutrient-deficiencies-by-crop/id847529160)

Identify crop fertility issues with this reference app. Browse by nutrient type or visually match crop symptoms to find solutions. Aids growers in making informed fertility decisions for their fields.

**Highlights:** Search by nutrient type, Browse crop photos, Match visual symptoms, Detailed deficiency descriptions, Wide variety of crops

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


## Frequently asked questions

### Is InField free?

InField is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Is Nutrient Deficiencies by Crop free?

Nutrient Deficiencies by Crop is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Which has better reviews, InField or Nutrient Deficiencies by Crop?

Nutrient Deficiencies by Crop is rated higher. InField averages 3.3 out of 5 from 29 ratings, while Nutrient Deficiencies by Crop averages 4.0 from 4 ratings.

### Do InField or Nutrient Deficiencies by Crop have ads?

Neither InField nor Nutrient Deficiencies by Crop shows ads.

### Which is updated more often, InField or Nutrient Deficiencies by Crop?

InField ships an update every 5 weeks, and Nutrient Deficiencies by Crop every 13 months. Most recently, InField was updated on November 1, 2026 and Nutrient Deficiencies by Crop on November 4, 2026.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*
