# 欧洲时报 vs FT中文网

The clearest difference is rating: FT中文网 at 4.7 against 欧洲时报's 4.0. FT中文网 also leads on ads (none vs shown) and ratings volume (1.6K vs 1). 欧洲时报's advantage is in-app purchases (none vs 10) and iOS requirement (11.0 vs 13.0). On price and device support there is nothing between them.

Both are free to download. FT中文网 sells 10 in-app purchases, starting at $5.99 per month. 欧洲时报 asks for nothing beyond the download.

FT中文网 holds the better App Store score, 4.7 against 4.0. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: FT中文网 has 1.6K ratings behind it against 1, so its average is the more settled of the two.

欧洲时报 ships an update every 5 weeks, FT中文网 weekly. The most recent releases landed on October 29, 2026 and October 30, 2026 respectively.

## The numbers

| Metric | 欧洲时报 | FT中文网 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | [4.0 (1 ratings)](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/id424559741/reviews) | **[4.7 (1.6K ratings)](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/ft/id443870811/reviews)** |
| Number of ratings | 1 | **1.6K** |
| Positive reviews | — | 43.4% of reviews |
| In-app purchases | **No** | Yes |
| Ads | Yes | **No** |
| Update frequency | Every 5 weeks | **Weekly** |
| Monetization | — | Subscription |
| Best chart rank | — | **#107** |
| Size | 18 MB | 29 MB |
| Requires iOS | **11.0** | 13.0 |
| Devices | iPhone, iPod | **iPhone, iPad, iPod** |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | [BEIJING ZHONG XIN CHINESE MEDIA SERVICE CO., LTD.](https://appshunter.io/developer/862839909) | [Financial Times Ltd.](https://appshunter.io/developer/322310071) |

## What reviewers say

### 欧洲时报

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/id424559741)

**In-app purchases:** none


### FT中文网

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/ft/id443870811)

**Currently charting:** #107 Top Grossing · News (US App Store)

Access in-depth financial news and commentary in Chinese from a global team of journalists. This redesigned app offers faster performance, a cleaner interface, and enhanced features for business executives and decision-makers.

**Highlights:** Faster app launches, High-definition display, Bilingual mode, Night mode, Article search, Topic-based subscriptions, Video content

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases (10)**

| Purchase | Price | Billing |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 标准会员 | $5.99 | per month |
| Standard Membership | $49.00 | per year |
| Premium Membership | $269.00 | per year |
| 留学，可以怎样改变一个人 | $0.99 | one-time |
| 是非区块链：技术、投机与泡沫 | $0.99 | one-time |
| 牛津女学霸的30年职场观察录 1 | $0.99 | one-time |
| 跟着欧美玩家小众游 | $0.99 | one-time |
| 2017：自信下的焦虑 | $1.99 | one-time |
| 2018前瞻：中美博弈之年？ | $1.99 | one-time |
| 2018与FT共进午餐 | $1.99 | one-time |

**What reviewers like**

- 🚀 Fast load times
- 💡 Useful Chinese-English translation feature
- 👍 Comprehensive and professional content

**What reviewers complain about**

- 🐛 Login and app crashes
- 🔋 Frequent log-outs and login issues
- 📢 Excessive ads and promotions for paid content
- 📉 Declining content quality and outdated information

**Reported bugs**

- Inability to access previously saved articles
- Inconsistent behavior between app and website versions
- Unreliable push notification system

**Requested features**

- Offline reading mode
- Improved search and article discovery
- More frequent content updates
- Traditional Chinese language support


## Frequently asked questions

### Is 欧洲时报 free?

欧洲时报 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Is FT中文网 free?

FT中文网 is free to download, with in-app purchases available.

### Which has better reviews, 欧洲时报 or FT中文网?

FT中文网 is rated higher. 欧洲时报 averages 4.0 out of 5 from 1 ratings, while FT中文网 averages 4.7 from 1.6K ratings.

### Do 欧洲时报 or FT中文网 have ads?

欧洲时报 shows ads; FT中文网 does not.

### Which is updated more often, 欧洲时报 or FT中文网?

欧洲时报 ships an update every 5 weeks, and FT中文网 weekly. Most recently, 欧洲时报 was updated on October 29, 2026 and FT中文网 on October 30, 2026.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*