# 履歴書年号 vs YokohamaBus

The clearest difference is ads: YokohamaBus at none against 履歴書年号's shown. 履歴書年号's advantage is iOS requirement (12.0 vs 15.4). On price, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

## The numbers

| Metric | 履歴書年号 | YokohamaBus |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Ads | Yes | **No** |
| Update frequency | Every 3 months | — |
| Size | 30 MB | 67 MB |
| Requires iOS | **12.0** | 15.4 |
| Devices | iPhone, iPod | **iPhone, iPad, iPod** |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | [Hit Apps](https://appshunter.io/developer/378755417) | [MAKOTO SASAKI](https://appshunter.io/developer/908850577) |

## What reviewers say

### 履歴書年号

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/id463157000)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility

**In-app purchases:** none


### YokohamaBus

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/yokohamabus/id1622582811)

**Features:** Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


## Frequently asked questions

### Is 履歴書年号 free?

履歴書年号 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Is YokohamaBus free?

YokohamaBus is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Do 履歴書年号 or YokohamaBus have ads?

履歴書年号 shows ads; YokohamaBus does not.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*