# ACP Clinical Guidelines vs DynaMedex

The clearest difference is rating: DynaMedex at 4.8 against ACP Clinical Guidelines's 3.0. DynaMedex also leads on ratings volume (687 vs 12). ACP Clinical Guidelines's advantage is review sentiment (81% vs 50%) and iOS requirement (12.0 vs 18.4). On price, update cadence, ads and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

DynaMedex holds the better App Store score, 4.8 against 3.0. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: DynaMedex has 687 ratings behind it against 12, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews complicate that: 81% of ACP Clinical Guidelines's written reviews are positive against 50% of DynaMedex's, so the app with the better star average is not the one people write more warmly about.

ACP Clinical Guidelines ships an update every 2 months, DynaMedex every 6 weeks. The most recent releases landed on October 21, 2026 and October 27, 2026 respectively.

## The numbers

| Metric | ACP Clinical Guidelines | DynaMedex |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | [3.0 (12 ratings)](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/acp-clinical-guidelines/id618318388/reviews) | **[4.8 (687 ratings)](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/dynamedex/id1519312217/reviews)** |
| Number of ratings | 12 | **687** |
| Positive reviews | **81.3% of reviews** | 50.0% of reviews |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Ads | No | No |
| Update frequency | Every 2 months | **Every 6 weeks** |
| Monetization | Free | Free |
| Size | 39 MB | 38 MB |
| Requires iOS | **12.0** | 18.4 |
| Devices | **iPhone, iPad, iPod** | iPhone, iPad |
| Age rating | 17+ | 17+ |
| Developer | [American College of Physicians](https://appshunter.io/developer/371090673) | [EBSCO Publishing](https://appshunter.io/developer/433269590) |

## What reviewers say

### ACP Clinical Guidelines

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/acp-clinical-guidelines/id618318388)

Access evidence-based clinical practice guidelines from the American College of Physicians on your mobile device. This app provides internal medicine physicians and other clinicians with convenient access to recommendations, summary tables, and algorithms in an interactive format.

**Highlights:** Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines, Recommendations and rationale, Summary tables, Algorithms, High value care advice, Interactive mobile format

**Features:** macOS Compatibility

**In-app purchases:** none


### DynaMedex

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/dynamedex/id1519312217)

This clinician-focused tool provides timely, objective analysis and guidance on patient care, drawing from rigorously reviewed medical literature. It offers comprehensive disease and medication content to support informed decision-making for healthcare professionals.

**Highlights:** Evidence-based patient care guidance, Daily medical literature review, Comprehensive disease content, Medication information, Mobile and desktop syncing, Clinician-focused tool

**Features:** Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


## Frequently asked questions

### Is ACP Clinical Guidelines free?

ACP Clinical Guidelines is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Is DynaMedex free?

DynaMedex is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Which has better reviews, ACP Clinical Guidelines or DynaMedex?

DynaMedex is rated higher. ACP Clinical Guidelines averages 3.0 out of 5 from 12 ratings, while DynaMedex averages 4.8 from 687 ratings.

### Do ACP Clinical Guidelines or DynaMedex have ads?

Neither ACP Clinical Guidelines nor DynaMedex shows ads.

### Which is updated more often, ACP Clinical Guidelines or DynaMedex?

ACP Clinical Guidelines ships an update every 2 months, and DynaMedex every 6 weeks. Most recently, ACP Clinical Guidelines was updated on October 21, 2026 and DynaMedex on October 27, 2026.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*