# 象奔奔司机端 vs PAM

The clearest difference is iOS requirement: PAM at 11.0 against 象奔奔司机端's 13.0. On price, ads, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

## The numbers

| Metric | 象奔奔司机端 | PAM |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Ads | No | No |
| Update frequency | Every 6 weeks | — |
| Size | 121 MB | 16 MB |
| Requires iOS | 13.0 | **11.0** |
| Devices | iPhone, iPod | iPhone, iPod |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | [福建禹福科技有限公司](https://appshunter.io/developer/1678881249) | [iRootech Technology Co., Ltd.](https://appshunter.io/developer/1193516407) |

## What reviewers say

### 象奔奔司机端

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/id6446716128)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


### PAM

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/pam/id6761507067)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


## Frequently asked questions

### Is 象奔奔司机端 free?

象奔奔司机端 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Is PAM free?

PAM is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Do 象奔奔司机端 or PAM have ads?

Neither 象奔奔司机端 nor PAM shows ads.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*