# 周易罗盘万年历 vs 伏羲万年历

The clearest difference is review sentiment: 周易罗盘万年历 at 100% against 伏羲万年历's 0%. 周易罗盘万年历 also leads on rating (5.0 vs 4.1) and ads (none vs shown). 伏羲万年历's advantage is monetization model (free with in-app purchases vs subscription) and ratings volume (12 vs 3). On price, update cadence and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.

Both are free to download. 周易罗盘万年历 sells 3 in-app purchases, starting at $2.99 per 7 days and 伏羲万年历 sells 4 in-app purchases, starting at $0.99 per month. Whichever you choose, the download price is not the number that matters.

周易罗盘万年历 holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 4.1. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 3 and 12 respectively. Written reviews point the same way: 100% of 周易罗盘万年历's written reviews are positive against 0% of 伏羲万年历's.

Both ship on a similar rhythm, roughly monthly. The most recent releases landed on October 9, 2026 and September 25, 2026 respectively.

## The numbers

| Metric | 周易罗盘万年历 | 伏羲万年历 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | **[5.0 (3 ratings)](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/id6466287669/reviews)** | [4.1 (12 ratings)](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/id6479241385/reviews) |
| Number of ratings | 3 | **12** |
| Positive reviews | **100.0% of reviews** | 0.0% of reviews |
| In-app purchases | Yes | Yes |
| Ads | **No** | Yes |
| Update frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
| Monetization | Subscription | **Free with in-app purchases** |
| Size | 111 MB | 149 MB |
| Requires iOS | 16.0 | **13.0** |
| Devices | iPhone | **iPhone, iPad, iPod, Apple Watch** |
| Age rating | 17+ | 4+ |
| Developer | [Chengdu Fuli Bo Technology Co. LTD](https://appshunter.io/developer/1649260773) | [Guangzhou Shengqi Network Technology Co.,Ltd.](https://appshunter.io/developer/1673930230) |

## What reviewers say

### 周易罗盘万年历

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/id6466287669)

This app combines a smart lunar calendar with a compass, offering features like poetry-inspired name generation, destiny analysis, and real-time altitude tracking. It serves as a guide for traditional culture, a creative tool for poetry lovers, and a navigation aid for travelers.

**Highlights:** Smart Lunar Calendar Compass, AI-Powered Name Generator, Destiny Analysis System, Real-time Geospatial Toolkit, Cultural Almanac, Altitude Positioning

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases (3)**

| Purchase | Price | Billing |
| --- | --- | --- |
| VIP连续周订阅 | $2.99 | per 7 days |
| VIP连续月订阅 | $4.99 | per month |
| VIP连续年订阅 | $19.99 | per year |


### 伏羲万年历

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/id6479241385)

This app offers a traditional Chinese calendar experience with a focus on cultural heritage. It features a simulated page-turning effect for the lunar calendar and provides practical tools for daily planning and understanding traditional festivals and solar terms.

**Highlights:** Simulated traditional lunar calendar page-turning, Display of traditional festivals and solar terms, Practical widgets for quick access, Focus on Chinese traditional culture, Modern interface with classic aesthetic

**Features:** macOS Compatibility

**In-app purchases (4)**

| Purchase | Price | Billing |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 连续包月 | $0.99 | per month |
| 连续包季 | $2.99 | per 3 months |
| 连续包年 | $9.99 | per year |
| 永久会员 | $29.99 | one-time |


## Frequently asked questions

### Is 周易罗盘万年历 free?

周易罗盘万年历 is free to download, with in-app purchases available.

### Is 伏羲万年历 free?

伏羲万年历 is free to download, with in-app purchases available.

### Which has better reviews, 周易罗盘万年历 or 伏羲万年历?

周易罗盘万年历 is rated higher. 周易罗盘万年历 averages 5.0 out of 5 from 3 ratings, while 伏羲万年历 averages 4.1 from 12 ratings.

### Do 周易罗盘万年历 or 伏羲万年历 have ads?

伏羲万年历 shows ads; 周易罗盘万年历 does not.

### Which is updated more often, 周易罗盘万年历 or 伏羲万年历?

周易罗盘万年历 ships an update monthly, and 伏羲万年历 monthly. Most recently, 周易罗盘万年历 was updated on October 9, 2026 and 伏羲万年历 on September 25, 2026.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*