# Playermaker 2.0 vs Touch

The clearest difference is rating: Touch at 4.6 against Playermaker 2.0's 3.4. Touch also leads on ads (none vs shown) and ratings volume (176 vs 23). Playermaker 2.0's advantage is in-app purchases (none vs 5) and review sentiment (33% vs 21%). On price, update cadence and device support there is nothing between them.

Both are free to download. Touch sells 5 in-app purchases, starting at $2.99 per 7 days. Playermaker 2.0 asks for nothing beyond the download.

Touch holds the better App Store score, 4.6 against 3.4. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: Touch has 176 ratings behind it against 23, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews complicate that: 33% of Playermaker 2.0's written reviews are positive against 21% of Touch's, so the app with the better star average is not the one people write more warmly about.

Playermaker 2.0 ships an update every 5 weeks, Touch monthly. The most recent releases landed on October 9, 2026 and October 11, 2026 respectively.

## The numbers

| Metric | Playermaker 2.0 | Touch |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | [3.4 (23 ratings)](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/playermaker-20/id6466816303/reviews) | **[4.6 (176 ratings)](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/touch-train-to-scroll/id6760316918/reviews)** |
| Number of ratings | 23 | **176** |
| Positive reviews | **33.3% of reviews** | 21.4% of reviews |
| In-app purchases | **No** | Yes |
| Ads | Yes | **No** |
| Update frequency | Every 5 weeks | **Monthly** |
| Monetization | **Ad-supported** | Freemium |
| Size | 147 MB | 468 MB |
| Requires iOS | **15.6** | 17.0 |
| Devices | **iPhone, iPod** | iPhone |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | [PLAYERMAKER LIMITED](https://appshunter.io/developer/1758049975) | [JUAN PABLO ROJAS URIBE](https://appshunter.io/developer/1850751715) |

## What reviewers say

### Playermaker 2.0

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/playermaker-20/id6466816303)

This app helps athletes track and improve key performance skills like first touch, dribbling, and speed. It provides objective measurements to aid in talent development and goal achievement across various games.

**Highlights:** Skill measurement, Talent identification, First touch tracking, Dribbling analysis, Speed and agility metrics, Two-footed ability assessment

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


### Touch

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/touch-train-to-scroll/id6760316918)

This app helps young footballers improve their ball control and juggling skills. It creates personalized training plans based on user input and automatically counts touches in real-time during practice sessions. The goal is to build a consistent habit for skill development.

**Highlights:** Personalized training plans, Automatic touch counting, Real-time feedback, Skill development tracking, Habit building for practice

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases (5)**

| Purchase | Price | Billing |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Touch Premium | $2.99 | per 7 days |
| Touch Premium | $4.99 | per month |
| Touch Yearly Premium Offer | $14.99 | per year |
| Touch Yearly Premium | $29.99 | per year |
| Touch Yearly Pro | $59.99 | per year |


## Frequently asked questions

### Is Playermaker 2.0 free?

Playermaker 2.0 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Is Touch free?

Touch is free to download, with in-app purchases available.

### Which has better reviews, Playermaker 2.0 or Touch?

Touch is rated higher. Playermaker 2.0 averages 3.4 out of 5 from 23 ratings, while Touch averages 4.6 from 176 ratings.

### Do Playermaker 2.0 or Touch have ads?

Playermaker 2.0 shows ads; Touch does not.

### Which is updated more often, Playermaker 2.0 or Touch?

Playermaker 2.0 ships an update every 5 weeks, and Touch monthly. Most recently, Playermaker 2.0 was updated on October 9, 2026 and Touch on October 11, 2026.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*