# A.M.L vs Pilates By Athletic

The clearest difference is device support: Pilates By Athletic at 3 against A.M.L's —. A.M.L's advantage is iOS requirement (12.0 vs 15.6). On price and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

## The numbers

| Metric | A.M.L | Pilates By Athletic |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Ads | — | No |
| Update frequency | — | Every 3 months |
| Size | 37 MB | 40 MB |
| Requires iOS | **12.0** | 15.6 |
| Devices | — | **iPhone, iPad, iPod** |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | [Rabia Abuhanna](https://appshunter.io/developer/1339102837) | [Target Point Software LTD](https://appshunter.io/developer/1606424295) |

## What reviewers say

### A.M.L

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/aml/id6496851908)

**In-app purchases:** none


### Pilates By Athletic

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/pilates-by-athletic/id6753034351)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


## Frequently asked questions

### Is A.M.L free?

A.M.L is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Is Pilates By Athletic free?

Pilates By Athletic is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*
