# 经典木鱼 vs 借问万年历软件

The clearest difference is iOS requirement: 借问万年历软件 at 13.0 against 经典木鱼's 15.0. On price, ads, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

## The numbers

| Metric | 经典木鱼 | 借问万年历软件 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Ads | No | No |
| Size | 20 MB | 184 MB |
| Requires iOS | 15.0 | **13.0** |
| Devices | **iPhone, iPad, iPod** | iPhone, iPod |
| Age rating | 12+ | 4+ |
| Developer | [Beijing The Great Civilization Age Information Technology Co.,Ltd.](https://appshunter.io/developer/1195055908) | [上海爻塔科技有限公司](https://appshunter.io/developer/1634396861) |

## What reviewers say

### 经典木鱼

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/id6499576332)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility

**In-app purchases:** none


### 借问万年历软件

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/id6748109472)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


## Frequently asked questions

### Is 经典木鱼 free?

经典木鱼 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Is 借问万年历软件 free?

借问万年历软件 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Do 经典木鱼 or 借问万年历软件 have ads?

Neither 经典木鱼 nor 借问万年历软件 shows ads.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*