# 经典木鱼 vs 万年历

The clearest difference is iOS requirement: 经典木鱼 at 15.0 against 万年历's 17.0. On price, ads, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

## The numbers

| Metric | 经典木鱼 | 万年历 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Ads | No | No |
| Update frequency | — | Every 6 weeks |
| Size | 20 MB | 8 MB |
| Requires iOS | **15.0** | 17.0 |
| Devices | **iPhone, iPad, iPod** | iPhone, iPad |
| Age rating | 12+ | 4+ |
| Developer | [Beijing The Great Civilization Age Information Technology Co.,Ltd.](https://appshunter.io/developer/1195055908) | [小丽 姜](https://appshunter.io/developer/1483410432) |

## What reviewers say

### 经典木鱼

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/id6499576332)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


### 万年历

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/id6759214500)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


## Frequently asked questions

### Is 经典木鱼 free?

经典木鱼 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Is 万年历 free?

万年历 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Do 经典木鱼 or 万年历 have ads?

Neither 经典木鱼 nor 万年历 shows ads.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*