# とりジャンプ vs ChickMatching

The clearest difference is ads: とりジャンプ at none against ChickMatching's shown. On price, in-app purchases, device support and iOS requirement there is nothing between them.

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

## The numbers

| Metric | とりジャンプ | ChickMatching |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| Positive reviews | 100.0% of reviews | — |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Ads | **No** | Yes |
| Update frequency | Every 5 days | — |
| Size | 45 MB | 108 MB |
| Requires iOS | 13.0 | 13.0 |
| Devices | iPhone, iPod | **iPhone, iPad, iPod** |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | [Manato Takeishi](https://appshunter.io/developer/1731628288) | [kenta yamada](https://appshunter.io/developer/1698424335) |

## What reviewers say

### とりジャンプ

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/id6502396905)

**In-app purchases:** none


### ChickMatching

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/chickmatching/id6749518414)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility

**In-app purchases:** none


## Frequently asked questions

### Is とりジャンプ free?

とりジャンプ is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Is ChickMatching free?

ChickMatching is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Do とりジャンプ or ChickMatching have ads?

ChickMatching shows ads; とりジャンプ does not.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*