# FATS vs Slider’s

FATS and Slider’s are too close to call on the numbers: across 5 compared parameters — price, ads, in-app purchases and device support among them — neither pulls far enough ahead to decide it. What separates them is feature set and interface, not measurable difference.

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

## The numbers

| Metric | FATS | Slider’s |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Ads | No | No |
| Update frequency | Every 2 months | — |
| Size | 106 MB | 80 MB |
| Requires iOS | 15.6 | **15.1** |
| Devices | iPhone, iPod | iPhone, iPod |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | [Starter Apps](https://appshunter.io/developer/1549865206) | [KHOT KEIS](https://appshunter.io/developer/1826242652) |

## What reviewers say

### FATS

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/fats/id6714484293)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


### Slider’s

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/sliders/id6802985316)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


## Frequently asked questions

### Is FATS free?

FATS is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Is Slider’s free?

Slider’s is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Do FATS or Slider’s have ads?

Neither FATS nor Slider’s shows ads.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*