# BALS vs 飞琥维护

BALS and 飞琥维护 are too close to call on the numbers: across 5 compared parameters — price, ads, in-app purchases and device support among them — neither pulls far enough ahead to decide it. What separates them is feature set and interface, not measurable difference.

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

## The numbers

| Metric | BALS | 飞琥维护 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Ads | No | No |
| Update frequency | Weekly | — |
| Size | 29 MB | 71 MB |
| Requires iOS | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| Devices | iPhone, iPod | iPhone, iPod |
| Age rating | 17+ | 4+ |
| Developer | [家玲 文](https://appshunter.io/developer/1669429647) | [广东通建综合能源智能技术服务有限公司](https://appshunter.io/developer/1794493568) |

## What reviewers say

### BALS

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/bals/id6730122189)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility

**In-app purchases:** none


### 飞琥维护

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/id6749848331)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


## Frequently asked questions

### Is BALS free?

BALS is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Is 飞琥维护 free?

飞琥维护 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Do BALS or 飞琥维护 have ads?

Neither BALS nor 飞琥维护 shows ads.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*