# 灵推岛 vs Philips E

The clearest difference is ads: Philips E at none against 灵推岛's shown. 灵推岛's advantage is iOS requirement (15.6 vs 17.0). On price, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

## The numbers

| Metric | 灵推岛 | Philips E |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Ads | Yes | **No** |
| Update frequency | Every 10 days | — |
| Size | 40 MB | 12 MB |
| Requires iOS | **15.6** | 17.0 |
| Devices | **iPhone, iPod** | iPhone |
| Age rating | 9+ | 4+ |
| Developer | [Shanghai Tiding Information Technology Co., Ltd.](https://appshunter.io/developer/1535433089) | [TP Vision Europe B.V.](https://appshunter.io/developer/528218637) |

## What reviewers say

### 灵推岛

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/id6739777738)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


### Philips E

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/philips-e-ink-studio/id6752277122)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


## Frequently asked questions

### Is 灵推岛 free?

灵推岛 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Is Philips E free?

Philips E is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Do 灵推岛 or Philips E have ads?

灵推岛 shows ads; Philips E does not.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*