# Double Sort vs Watery Ring Flick

The clearest difference is ads: Watery Ring Flick at none against Double Sort's shown. Double Sort's advantage is iOS requirement (12.0 vs 14.0). On price, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

## The numbers

| Metric | Double Sort | Watery Ring Flick |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Ads | Yes | **No** |
| Size | 102 MB | 4 MB |
| Requires iOS | **12.0** | 14.0 |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad, iPod | iPhone, iPad, iPod |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | [Fatih Can Temel](https://appshunter.io/developer/1493345618) | [Beyond Confident Labs LLC](https://appshunter.io/developer/1079292911) |

## What reviewers say

### Double Sort

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/double-sort/id6745830916)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility

**In-app purchases:** none


### Watery Ring Flick

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/watery-ring-flick/id6747322820)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility

**In-app purchases:** none


## Frequently asked questions

### Is Double Sort free?

Double Sort is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Is Watery Ring Flick free?

Watery Ring Flick is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Do Double Sort or Watery Ring Flick have ads?

Double Sort shows ads; Watery Ring Flick does not.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*