# ShareTimer vs TimerLync

The clearest difference is ads: TimerLync at none against ShareTimer's shown. ShareTimer's advantage is iOS requirement (12.0 vs 17.0). On price, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

## The numbers

| Metric | ShareTimer | TimerLync |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Ads | Yes | **No** |
| Update frequency | — | Fortnightly |
| Size | 32 MB | 5 MB |
| Requires iOS | **12.0** | 17.0 |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad, iPod | iPhone, iPad, Apple Watch |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | [Wataru Naotsuka](https://appshunter.io/developer/1821566933) | [JUKI JUNG](https://appshunter.io/developer/1212179274) |

## What reviewers say

### ShareTimer

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/sharetimer/id6749925319)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility

**In-app purchases:** none


### TimerLync

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/timerlync/id6795109124)

**Features:** Apple Watch app

**In-app purchases:** none


## Frequently asked questions

### Is ShareTimer free?

ShareTimer is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Is TimerLync free?

TimerLync is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Do ShareTimer or TimerLync have ads?

ShareTimer shows ads; TimerLync does not.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*