# Calorie Tracker vs Loopa

The clearest difference is iOS requirement: Calorie Tracker at 15.1 against Loopa's 17.0. On price, ads, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

## The numbers

| Metric | Calorie Tracker | Loopa |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Ads | No | No |
| Update frequency | — | Monthly |
| Size | 31 MB | 9 MB |
| Requires iOS | **15.1** | 17.0 |
| Devices | iPhone, iPod | iPhone, iPad |
| Age rating | 17+ | 12+ |
| Developer | [Steady Wins Technologies Corporation](https://appshunter.io/developer/1807603750) | [Anthony Awdi](https://appshunter.io/developer/1890533867) |

## What reviewers say

### Calorie Tracker

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/calorie-tracker-munch/id6751526526)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility

**In-app purchases:** none


### Loopa

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/loopa-contraceptive-ring/id6790433104)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


## Frequently asked questions

### Is Calorie Tracker free?

Calorie Tracker is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Is Loopa free?

Loopa is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Do Calorie Tracker or Loopa have ads?

Neither Calorie Tracker nor Loopa shows ads.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*