# QuickPaste vs 照片液态玻璃水印

The clearest difference is rating: 照片液态玻璃水印 at 5.0 against QuickPaste's 4.2. 照片液态玻璃水印 also leads on iOS requirement (15.0 vs 17.0). QuickPaste's advantage is ratings volume (5 vs 1). On price, review sentiment, update cadence and ads there is nothing between them.

Both are free to download. QuickPaste sells 3 in-app purchases, starting at $0.99 per month and 照片液态玻璃水印 sells 3 one-off in-app purchases. Whichever you choose, the download price is not the number that matters.

照片液态玻璃水印 holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 4.2. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: QuickPaste has 5 ratings behind it against 1, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews point the same way: 93% of QuickPaste's written reviews are positive against 100% of 照片液态玻璃水印's.

Both ship on a similar rhythm, roughly every 6 days. The most recent releases landed on October 14, 2026 and October 9, 2026 respectively.

## The numbers

| Metric | QuickPaste | 照片液态玻璃水印 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | [4.2 (5 ratings)](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/quickpaste-quick-clipboard/id6755954671/reviews) | **[5.0 (1 ratings)](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/id6807027325/reviews)** |
| Number of ratings | **5** | 1 |
| Positive reviews | 93.3% of reviews | **100.0% of reviews** |
| In-app purchases | Yes | Yes |
| Ads | No | No |
| Update frequency | Every 6 days | Every 6 days |
| Monetization | Freemium | — |
| Size | 17 MB | 4 MB |
| Requires iOS | 17.0 | **15.0** |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad | **iPhone, iPad, iPod** |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | [玉春 蔡](https://appshunter.io/developer/1855893690) | [秀华 李](https://appshunter.io/developer/1632733591) |

## What reviewers say

### QuickPaste

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/quickpaste-quick-clipboard/id6755954671)

This utility app streamlines your copy-paste workflow by automatically saving your clipboard history and allowing quick access to frequently used text snippets. It features a custom keyboard for seamless integration and prioritizes user privacy with local data storage.

**Highlights:** Clipboard history management, Custom keyboard access, Snippets manager, Smart tokenizer, Local data storage, One-click access

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Family Sharing, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases (3)**

| Purchase | Price | Billing |
| --- | --- | --- |
| QuickPaste Pro Monthly Subscription | $0.99 | per month |
| Early Bird Lifetime | $0.99 | one-time |
| Lifetime Access | $1.99 | one-time |


### 照片液态玻璃水印

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/id6807027325)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases (3)**

| Purchase | Price | Billing |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Small Tip | $0.99 | one-time |
| Coffee Tip | $1.99 | one-time |
| Generous Tip | $4.99 | one-time |


## Frequently asked questions

### Is QuickPaste free?

QuickPaste is free to download, with in-app purchases available.

### Is 照片液态玻璃水印 free?

照片液态玻璃水印 is free to download, with in-app purchases available.

### Which has better reviews, QuickPaste or 照片液态玻璃水印?

照片液态玻璃水印 is rated higher. QuickPaste averages 4.2 out of 5 from 5 ratings, while 照片液态玻璃水印 averages 5.0 from 1 ratings.

### Do QuickPaste or 照片液态玻璃水印 have ads?

Neither QuickPaste nor 照片液态玻璃水印 shows ads.

### Which is updated more often, QuickPaste or 照片液态玻璃水印?

QuickPaste ships an update every 6 days, and 照片液态玻璃水印 every 6 days. Most recently, QuickPaste was updated on October 14, 2026 and 照片液态玻璃水印 on October 9, 2026.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*