# Photo Packer vs Squash

The clearest difference is ads: Squash at none against Photo Packer's shown. On price, in-app purchases, device support and iOS requirement there is nothing between them.

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

## The numbers

| Metric | Photo Packer | Squash |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Ads | Yes | **No** |
| Update frequency | Daily | — |
| Size | 7 MB | 2 MB |
| Requires iOS | **26.1** | 26.2 |
| Devices | iPhone | iPhone |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | [daiki ozawa](https://appshunter.io/developer/1859953314) | [Oguzcan Oruc](https://appshunter.io/developer/1815138594) |

## What reviewers say

### Photo Packer

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/photo-packer/id6756397100)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility

**In-app purchases:** none


### Squash

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/squash-batch-photo-editor/id6760965123)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


## Frequently asked questions

### Is Photo Packer free?

Photo Packer is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Is Squash free?

Squash is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Do Photo Packer or Squash have ads?

Photo Packer shows ads; Squash does not.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*