# Veins vs progressive overloading

The clearest difference is ads: progressive overloading at none against Veins's shown. On price, in-app purchases, device support and iOS requirement there is nothing between them.

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

## The numbers

| Metric | Veins | progressive overloading |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Ads | Yes | **No** |
| Update frequency | — | Every 3 weeks |
| Size | 36 MB | 41 MB |
| Requires iOS | 15.1 | 15.1 |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad, iPod | iPhone, iPad, iPod |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | [Abhishek Dhyani](https://appshunter.io/developer/1864977463) | [Habibullah Yousofi](https://appshunter.io/developer/1879058266) |

## What reviewers say

### Veins

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/veins-workout-tracker-and-log/id6757164368)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility

**In-app purchases:** none


### progressive overloading

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/progressive-overloading/id6759499451)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


## Frequently asked questions

### Is Veins free?

Veins is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Is progressive overloading free?

progressive overloading is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Do Veins or progressive overloading have ads?

Veins shows ads; progressive overloading does not.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*