# Markdown to Image vs QuickMark

The clearest difference is in-app purchases: Markdown to Image at none against QuickMark's 1. QuickMark's advantage is device support (3 vs 1). On price, ads and iOS requirement there is nothing between them.

Both are free to download. QuickMark sells 1 one-off in-app purchase. Markdown to Image asks for nothing beyond the download.

## The numbers

| Metric | Markdown to Image | QuickMark |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| In-app purchases | **No** | Yes |
| Ads | No | No |
| Update frequency | — | Weekly |
| Size | 2 MB | 12 MB |
| Requires iOS | 18.5 | **17.0** |
| Devices | iPhone | **iPhone, iPad, Mac** |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | [军 沈](https://appshunter.io/developer/1871797808) | [Doan Nguyen](https://appshunter.io/developer/995899135) |

## What reviewers say

### Markdown to Image

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/markdown-to-image/id6758534222)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


### QuickMark

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/quickmark-markdown-editor/id6764753884)

**Features:** Family Sharing, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases (1)**

| Purchase | Price | Billing |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Pro Lifetime | $9.99 | one-time |


## Frequently asked questions

### Is Markdown to Image free?

Markdown to Image is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Is QuickMark free?

QuickMark is free to download, with in-app purchases available.

### Do Markdown to Image or QuickMark have ads?

Neither Markdown to Image nor QuickMark shows ads.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*