# 固定費管理 vs 1s Expense

The clearest difference is ads: 1s Expense at none against 固定費管理's shown. 固定費管理's advantage is iOS requirement (13.0 vs 26.5). On price, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

## The numbers

| Metric | 固定費管理 | 1s Expense |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Ads | Yes | **No** |
| Update frequency | Fortnightly | — |
| Size | 26 MB | 6 MB |
| Requires iOS | **13.0** | 26.5 |
| Devices | **iPhone, iPad, iPod** | iPhone, iPad |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | [sho honma](https://appshunter.io/developer/1880010121) | [Yuna Takahashi](https://appshunter.io/developer/1585820822) |

## What reviewers say

### 固定費管理

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/id6759659462)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


### 1s Expense

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/1s-expense-simple-tracker/id6781699829)

**In-app purchases:** none


## Frequently asked questions

### Is 固定費管理 free?

固定費管理 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Is 1s Expense free?

1s Expense is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Do 固定費管理 or 1s Expense have ads?

固定費管理 shows ads; 1s Expense does not.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*