# TimeCatcher vs FloralMD

TimeCatcher and FloralMD are too close to call on the numbers: across 5 compared parameters — price, ads, in-app purchases and device support among them — neither pulls far enough ahead to decide it. What separates them is feature set and interface, not measurable difference.

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

## The numbers

| Metric | TimeCatcher | FloralMD |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Ads | No | No |
| Update frequency | Weekly | — |
| Size | 58 MB | 3 MB |
| Requires iOS | 18.0 | **17.0** |
| Devices | **iPhone, iPad** | iPhone |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | [Parotid](https://appshunter.io/developer/1723685802) | [英凯 孙](https://appshunter.io/developer/6794178939) |

## What reviewers say

### TimeCatcher

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/timecatcher/id6760287864)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


### FloralMD

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/floralmd/id6795008224)

**Features:** Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


## Frequently asked questions

### Is TimeCatcher free?

TimeCatcher is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Is FloralMD free?

FloralMD is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Do TimeCatcher or FloralMD have ads?

Neither TimeCatcher nor FloralMD shows ads.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*