# Gomoku vs 鬥獸棋 Classic

The clearest difference is ads: Gomoku at none against 鬥獸棋 Classic's shown. Gomoku also leads on iOS requirement (15.0 vs 17.0). On price, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

## The numbers

| Metric | Gomoku | 鬥獸棋 Classic |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Ads | **No** | Yes |
| Update frequency | — | Weekly |
| Size | 3 MB | 22 MB |
| Requires iOS | **15.0** | 17.0 |
| Devices | iPhone, iPod | iPhone, iPad |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | [晓 郭](https://appshunter.io/developer/1895645928) | [William Lock](https://appshunter.io/developer/1779425409) |

## What reviewers say

### Gomoku

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/gomoku-arcade/id6773746767)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


### 鬥獸棋 Classic

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/classic/id6775230075)

**Features:** Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


## Frequently asked questions

### Is Gomoku free?

Gomoku is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Is 鬥獸棋 Classic free?

鬥獸棋 Classic is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Do Gomoku or 鬥獸棋 Classic have ads?

鬥獸棋 Classic shows ads; Gomoku does not.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*