# 码达 vs Cycle Timers

The clearest difference is iOS requirement: Cycle Timers at 17.0 against 码达's 26.2. On price, ads, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

## The numbers

| Metric | 码达 | Cycle Timers |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Ads | No | No |
| Update frequency | — | Every 4 days |
| Size | 5 MB | 11 MB |
| Requires iOS | 26.2 | **17.0** |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad | iPhone, iPad |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | [宇寒 乔](https://appshunter.io/developer/1877015382) | [Izotz Cristobal Mota](https://appshunter.io/developer/1889865541) |

## What reviewers say

### 码达

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/id6787702467)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


### Cycle Timers

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/cycle-timers/id6796827400)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


## Frequently asked questions

### Is 码达 free?

码达 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Is Cycle Timers free?

Cycle Timers is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Do 码达 or Cycle Timers have ads?

Neither 码达 nor Cycle Timers shows ads.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*