# Y2K vs Low Quality Camera

The clearest difference is ads: Y2K at none against Low Quality Camera's shown. Low Quality Camera's advantage is device support (3 vs 1) and iOS requirement (15.6 vs 17.0). On price and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

## The numbers

| Metric | Y2K | Low Quality Camera |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Ads | **No** | Yes |
| Update frequency | Every 2 days | — |
| Size | 5 MB | 14 MB |
| Requires iOS | 17.0 | **15.6** |
| Devices | iPhone | **iPhone, iPad, iPod** |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | [KYUNGHYUN HAN](https://appshunter.io/developer/1896324465) | [Ryouhei Azuma](https://appshunter.io/developer/1353297781) |

## What reviewers say

### Y2K

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/y2k/id6793872708)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


### Low Quality Camera

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/low-quality-camera-tiny-files/id6800354391)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


## Frequently asked questions

### Is Y2K free?

Y2K is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Is Low Quality Camera free?

Low Quality Camera is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Do Y2K or Low Quality Camera have ads?

Low Quality Camera shows ads; Y2K does not.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*