# Low Quality Camera vs Time to Flash

The clearest difference is ads: Time to Flash at none against Low Quality Camera's shown. Low Quality Camera's advantage is device support (3 vs 1). On price, in-app purchases and iOS requirement there is nothing between them.

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

## The numbers

| Metric | Low Quality Camera | Time to Flash |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Ads | Yes | **No** |
| Update frequency | — | Every 3 days |
| Size | 14 MB | 53 MB |
| Requires iOS | **15.6** | 16.4 |
| Devices | **iPhone, iPad, iPod** | iPhone |
| Age rating | 4+ | 12+ |
| Developer | [Ryouhei Azuma](https://appshunter.io/developer/1353297781) | [CLEMENT TANGUY HERVE LEMEPLE](https://appshunter.io/developer/6801111369) |

## What reviewers say

### Low Quality Camera

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/low-quality-camera-tiny-files/id6800354391)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


### Time to Flash

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/time-to-flash/id6801111367)

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


## Frequently asked questions

### Is Low Quality Camera free?

Low Quality Camera is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Is Time to Flash free?

Time to Flash is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Do Low Quality Camera or Time to Flash have ads?

Low Quality Camera shows ads; Time to Flash does not.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*