# 医脉通 vs 病历夹经典版

The clearest difference is rating: 医脉通 at 4.9 against 病历夹经典版's 4.3. 医脉通 also leads on ratings volume (79 vs 6). 病历夹经典版's advantage is in-app purchases (none vs 10) and iOS requirement (13.0 vs 15.0). On price, review sentiment, update cadence and ads there is nothing between them.

Both are free to download. 医脉通 sells 9 in-app purchases, starting at $2.99 per month. 病历夹经典版 asks for nothing beyond the download.

医脉通 holds the better App Store score, 4.9 against 4.3. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: 医脉通 has 79 ratings behind it against 6, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews complicate that: 95% of 医脉通's written reviews are positive against 100% of 病历夹经典版's, so the app with the better star average is not the one people write more warmly about.

医脉通 ships an update every 3 weeks, 病历夹经典版 every 5 weeks. The most recent releases landed on November 8, 2026 and November 6, 2026 respectively.

## The numbers

| Metric | 医脉通 | 病历夹经典版 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | **[4.9 (79 ratings)](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/id694925256/reviews)** | [4.3 (6 ratings)](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/id717601907/reviews) |
| Number of ratings | **79** | 6 |
| Positive reviews | 95.5% of reviews | **100.0% of reviews** |
| In-app purchases | Yes | **No** |
| Ads | No | No |
| Update frequency | **Every 3 weeks** | Every 5 weeks |
| Monetization | Free with in-app purchases | **Free** |
| Size | 96 MB | 105 MB |
| Requires iOS | 15.0 | **13.0** |
| Devices | **iPhone, iPad, iPod** | iPhone, iPod |
| Age rating | 17+ | 12+ |
| Developer | [BEIJING KINGYEE TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.](https://appshunter.io/developer/474664125) | [北京杏树林信息咨询有限公司](https://appshunter.io/developer/1190239374) |

## What reviewers say

### 医脉通

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/id694925256)

This platform aggregates medical information, including the latest advancements, clinical guidelines, and drug information. It offers resources for medical professionals and students, covering news, case discussions, drug references, exam preparation, and research support.

**Highlights:** Medical news and advancements, Clinical guidelines and drug information, Case discussions and medical courses, Exam preparation and research support, Professional medical team content

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases (9)**

| Purchase | Price | Billing |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 指南vip连续包月服务 | $2.99 | per month |
| 指南vip连续包年服务 | $22.99 | per year |
| 单篇指南 | $0.99 | one-time |
| 1个月的知识库会员 | $2.99 | one-time |
| 指南月度会员 | $3.99 | one-time |
| 指南季度会员 | $6.99 | one-time |
| 指南年度会员 | $19.99 | one-time |
| 指南年度会员 | $22.99 | one-time |
| 1年的指南+参考+知识库会员 | $34.99 | one-time |


### 病历夹经典版

[App page](https://appshunter.io/ios/app/id717601907)

This app helps doctors manage patient records and communication efficiently. It offers intelligent patient management from medical history to follow-up, with features like image recognition and secure cloud storage. Designed for Chinese doctors, it streamlines workflows and enhances patient interaction.

**Highlights:** Intelligent patient record management, Image and voice recognition for medical terms, Secure cloud storage with unlimited space, Seamless WeChat integration for patient follow-up, Multi-device synchronization, HIPAA compliant data security

**Features:** macOS Compatibility, Vision Pro support

**In-app purchases:** none


## Frequently asked questions

### Is 医脉通 free?

医脉通 is free to download, with in-app purchases available.

### Is 病历夹经典版 free?

病历夹经典版 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

### Which has better reviews, 医脉通 or 病历夹经典版?

医脉通 is rated higher. 医脉通 averages 4.9 out of 5 from 79 ratings, while 病历夹经典版 averages 4.3 from 6 ratings.

### Do 医脉通 or 病历夹经典版 have ads?

Neither 医脉通 nor 病历夹经典版 shows ads.

### Which is updated more often, 医脉通 or 病历夹经典版?

医脉通 ships an update every 3 weeks, and 病历夹经典版 every 5 weeks. Most recently, 医脉通 was updated on November 8, 2026 and 病历夹经典版 on November 6, 2026.

---

*Compared by [AppsHunter](https://appshunter.io/) from daily US App Store data. Review summaries are generated from verbatim App Store reviews.*