Leave a Review Tree Id USA
Very disappointed
Once you get to a group of possible trees, there are no leaf pictures, no bark pictures, in the case of walnut it only shows the fruit. Definitely not what I was looking for.spike443
You forgot something
Just purchased this and I found that my state, Washington, didn’t make the list.bybymsn
Has potential but needs refinement
This is s review of the Trees USA app.
My start screen is set to the Gallery Page. It is the page with the cartoon pictures of deciduous trees, shrubs, conifers, and vines. Every time I open the ap, it defaults to New York. It would be better to stay on the previous setting. The categories are not correct. For example a live oak is an evergreen but is listed in the deciduous category. A bald cypress is listed as a conifer but is also deciduous. There are also many trees listed in my home state that do not grow here.
The identification page seems to work well except it list all trees not just the one filtered by the state. An exact search with a particular state or with the state set at “all” returns the same results. Also the “habitat” section is very weak (swamp, lakeside, mountains, etc would be much better)
The alphabetic listing with the pictures is ok. Again the state filter does not work here. In general the pictures are well done and there are enough to help with identifying a tree. A useful feature to add would be while looking a particular tree if you could click the family and see all the trees in that family.
If the filters worked properly this could be a very useful app.
Edited 04-16-18 to add:
There are no maps (that I can find) to show the range of each tree.Show lessKatherinb
App will not download after purchase
I paid for this app but it will not download.LSUHawkPilot
Trees USA
The app needs reorganization by region so you can quickly eliminate trees or shrubs you won’t see the your current location. It could use other such filters to more quickly zero in on the plant in question. Offering the ability to submit a photo of your plant would also be useful. And of course more species need to be added.
Alan McCoyShow lessAHMcCoy
Useless
-Doesn’t have my state.
-Some photos are distant so can’t really see the leaves well.
-great idea thoXai
Needs more pictures
I live in Vermont. During winter months there are no leaves on many of the trees. I would like to be able to identify trees by their bark. You don’t offer this. Plus I would rather see real pictures of trees and leaves not cartoons.longshotvt
Won't download
I can't even get this app to download after trying for several weeks. I hope Apple will refund my money.DanC164729
Decent, but needs some additional features
Frankly I’m confused by some of the other reviews that claim it doesn’t have whole-tree photos. Mine certainly does.
My complaints: 1. It needs a glossary. There are many specialized terms in botany, and having to google them is a pain. 2. App doesn’t remember my selected US state from one launch to the next. It always goes back to NY.Show lessmartin123458
Developer Response
Dear customer, thank you so much for your review. And also thank you for pointing out there indeed are whole-tree images. Good idea including a glossary, we will discuss this for upcoming updates. The second mentioned issue is a bug - the good thing is we have fixed this. The app won't jump back to screen one again with the next update.Rip off
I wish I would've done a bit more research before purchasing and I wish I could get my money back. If you don't already know the name of the tree, you're out of luck with out a lot of clicking around. A tree outside the window at work, common around town, isn't even in the app. Very disappointed. Feel ripped offShow lessNursewise
