Thank You
Just finished reading chronologically for the first time. Have read several times over the years but this brought God’s Word together in a new light. Finally understand which prophet goes with which king and so on. Good app that lets you read at your pace. I love it and give a heart felt Thank You to the developers.
Would like to see about the ESV translation in your future.
Would like to see about the ESV translation in your future.
Show less
Audio
Why not make it audio
Ads
Cannot remove ads which take away from your reading as ads are persistently changing
No dates
Each day is labeled by a day number. Why not offer a setting that shows the actual date Instead of needing to remember what day of the year I’m on
Brings the Bible to life!
I LOVE this app. I have now read the bible three times thru using it, and it gets better and more alive each time. Now it’s like reading a ‘story’ with beginning, middle, end, characters, themes, etc., vs. the disjointed, somewhat arbitrary way it is classically organized and presented. This version puts OT stories together so you get the whole picture, breaks up psalms and puts them where they are relevant, puts gospel stories together for comparison, and on and on. Disregard the negative reviews, as they are simply wrong. And this is FREE! It would be worth paying for, and i cant thank it’s creator enough for blessing me with it. THANK YOU VERY MUCH!! Excellent work.
Show less
Really love this app
Reading the Bible in chronological order has been such a blessing!
Can’t do anything
How do I change the language?
Not chronological
This is a traditional Canonical order Bible, not in chronological order.
Chronological Bible
This is what my spouse and I were looking for. We both wish we could find it also in audio to listen driving to and from work and after prayers listen again prior to sleep. We enjoy both reading and listening. Thank you for making this possible of all the Bible you are the only one who offers chronological. This is important in our walk with the Son Christ Jesus, God the Father, and the Blessed Holy Spirit. Thank you.
Show less
Useful resource. Performs as advertised.
This app is exactly as advertised:
- Chronological Bible
- KJV
- Organized into 365 readings
It’s no frills. I’ll say it again, it does no more and no less than advertised. And, it’s FREE guys.
SUGGESTED IMPROVEMENTS
I suggest the developer add a couple enhancements.
- Provide an option to view an outline of the chronological order without the divisions into assigned reading days.
- It’s unnecessarily inconvenient that I’m always returned to the beginning of the list of days when i back up from a day into which i had drilled down. Please improve the app so that it returns the user to where they ppreviously were in the list when they click backwards to the list of days. For example, i would like it to RETURN me to the view of days 100 to 108 ( or whatever) where i had been before I had drilled down into one of those days.
RESPONSE TO THE LOW RATINGS THAT ARE MISLEADING
I don’t know the developer. Never met him. It just bothers me that some reviewers would discourage others from taking advantage of a GIFT that can help their knowledge of the Bible. (Because the developer’s provided it to the world for FREE, it is a gift to us. Be grateful that it’s free and it works.)
One of the reviewers ignorantly complains that the chronological order in this Bible doesn’t fully match the order in another he owns. The reviewer’s apparently unaware that there is often variation between chronologies because there is debate about when some events happened. Plus, there are different styles of chronologies. In sum, the reviewer’s complaint and low star rating were unwarranted.
One of the other reviewers also unjustly gave the app a low star rating. He complained that the audio feature had been dropped from this version. IMO, it would be okay to ask the developer to add it back in. But because the app description does NOT even imply that the audio feature is present, I consider the low rating to be unfair and misleading.
WRITING REVIEWS THAT ARE HELPFUL TO SHOPPERS
It’s misleading to shoppers when a review unjustly gives an app a low rating. Instead, reviews should rate an app on its degree of success at delivering as advertised.
The reviewer shouldn’t give an app low marks because it doesn’t already have features that they WISH for. Rather, the reviewer should give a positive suggestion that the developer consider enhancing the app with the features preferred by that reviewer.
- Chronological Bible
- KJV
- Organized into 365 readings
It’s no frills. I’ll say it again, it does no more and no less than advertised. And, it’s FREE guys.
SUGGESTED IMPROVEMENTS
I suggest the developer add a couple enhancements.
- Provide an option to view an outline of the chronological order without the divisions into assigned reading days.
- It’s unnecessarily inconvenient that I’m always returned to the beginning of the list of days when i back up from a day into which i had drilled down. Please improve the app so that it returns the user to where they ppreviously were in the list when they click backwards to the list of days. For example, i would like it to RETURN me to the view of days 100 to 108 ( or whatever) where i had been before I had drilled down into one of those days.
RESPONSE TO THE LOW RATINGS THAT ARE MISLEADING
I don’t know the developer. Never met him. It just bothers me that some reviewers would discourage others from taking advantage of a GIFT that can help their knowledge of the Bible. (Because the developer’s provided it to the world for FREE, it is a gift to us. Be grateful that it’s free and it works.)
One of the reviewers ignorantly complains that the chronological order in this Bible doesn’t fully match the order in another he owns. The reviewer’s apparently unaware that there is often variation between chronologies because there is debate about when some events happened. Plus, there are different styles of chronologies. In sum, the reviewer’s complaint and low star rating were unwarranted.
One of the other reviewers also unjustly gave the app a low star rating. He complained that the audio feature had been dropped from this version. IMO, it would be okay to ask the developer to add it back in. But because the app description does NOT even imply that the audio feature is present, I consider the low rating to be unfair and misleading.
WRITING REVIEWS THAT ARE HELPFUL TO SHOPPERS
It’s misleading to shoppers when a review unjustly gives an app a low rating. Instead, reviews should rate an app on its degree of success at delivering as advertised.
The reviewer shouldn’t give an app low marks because it doesn’t already have features that they WISH for. Rather, the reviewer should give a positive suggestion that the developer consider enhancing the app with the features preferred by that reviewer.
Show less
