Great app and it’s free!
This app is great! I wanted an app to make some graph I can illustrate different translations on. This does the job and then some. Once you play around with it, it’s quite easy to get the hang of. I love that i can put specific points on a graph using my finger on my ipad.
I can’t wait to check out some of the other features and your other apps. This one is titled as a suite, does that mean it covers some of your other apps or are they all different?
I can’t wait to check out some of the other features and your other apps. This one is titled as a suite, does that mean it covers some of your other apps or are they all different?
Show less
Update
This review now includes a Probability Calculator
Needs ability to store editable images
Please allow storing editable versions of the images on the phone.
软件很好
ios13.1点进去闪退 cant work
Update?
When are they going to add a Probability Calculator?
The app now includes a
Probability Calculator
A Truly Impressive Toolbox For Active Engagement
This set of tools provides the means to interface with real-world maths problems as a visualisation tool and solver with which one actively engages for things such as linear algebra, systems of equations, calculus, Euclidean geometry, statistics, and algorithms. It allows maths to be delivered visually, analytically, and computationally all at once, and in a genuinely dynamic capacity that promotes learning by doing, presenting maths as a subject to be investigated through experimentation for the first time.
I hope this will be capitalised on by school teachers who might otherwise still believe that videos† constitute "interactive learning".
Excellent software for mathematical hobbyists. Essential software for pupils at any stage of mandatory education, which now forces two extra years of the worst parts of maths being taught in the dullest possible way to the least numerate and literate teens in the UK since the 1950s. GeoGebra might be the only remedy to what might otherwise end up supplying Terence Howard with a generation of disenfranchised followers convinced that 1 × 1 = 1 is a based opinion that explains their innumeracy was the result of mathematicians gaslighting the rest of society. Hexagons are not, and never will be, the bestagons—but the fact that hexagons became so widely believed by teenagers to require interventions on YouTube from structural engineers (seriously) and Neil deGrasse Tyson (obviously) indicates that: a) declining standards of maths and science education is a much bigger problem than Andrew Tate, whose only intervention has been from the law; and b) GeoGebra is a much easier, more effective, cheaper (free, in fact), and prophylactic tool that will empower kids to put down the machetes, and get into the Cartesian lifestyle.
Undergraduate maths and physics students will still need to shell out money for something like Mathematica, as GeoGebra is limited to real numbers, fiinite quantities, Euclidean space, three or fewer dimensions, and first-order logic.
______________
†[ Watching an video is the only mode of learning more passive than reading a textbook in silence, which has been shown to burn fewer calories of mental energy than simply staring at a blank wall. That is to say, the brain devotes less energy to learning maths from a YouTube video than it does to processing all the stuff going on in someone's head when sitting alone in silence. It's probable the only thinking that requires energy whilst doom scrolling comes from the few neurons involved in convincing someone how much they must have learned in the 12 minutes spent watching someone else do some maths. 3Blue1Brown is genuinely excellent, of course, but his videos can only teach what one invests time and effort into doing with pen and paper everything one wishes to learn and understand (over and over and over). ]
I hope this will be capitalised on by school teachers who might otherwise still believe that videos† constitute "interactive learning".
Excellent software for mathematical hobbyists. Essential software for pupils at any stage of mandatory education, which now forces two extra years of the worst parts of maths being taught in the dullest possible way to the least numerate and literate teens in the UK since the 1950s. GeoGebra might be the only remedy to what might otherwise end up supplying Terence Howard with a generation of disenfranchised followers convinced that 1 × 1 = 1 is a based opinion that explains their innumeracy was the result of mathematicians gaslighting the rest of society. Hexagons are not, and never will be, the bestagons—but the fact that hexagons became so widely believed by teenagers to require interventions on YouTube from structural engineers (seriously) and Neil deGrasse Tyson (obviously) indicates that: a) declining standards of maths and science education is a much bigger problem than Andrew Tate, whose only intervention has been from the law; and b) GeoGebra is a much easier, more effective, cheaper (free, in fact), and prophylactic tool that will empower kids to put down the machetes, and get into the Cartesian lifestyle.
Undergraduate maths and physics students will still need to shell out money for something like Mathematica, as GeoGebra is limited to real numbers, fiinite quantities, Euclidean space, three or fewer dimensions, and first-order logic.
______________
†[ Watching an video is the only mode of learning more passive than reading a textbook in silence, which has been shown to burn fewer calories of mental energy than simply staring at a blank wall. That is to say, the brain devotes less energy to learning maths from a YouTube video than it does to processing all the stuff going on in someone's head when sitting alone in silence. It's probable the only thinking that requires energy whilst doom scrolling comes from the few neurons involved in convincing someone how much they must have learned in the 12 minutes spent watching someone else do some maths. 3Blue1Brown is genuinely excellent, of course, but his videos can only teach what one invests time and effort into doing with pen and paper everything one wishes to learn and understand (over and over and over). ]
Show less
Lacks key functionality
My experience has been good so far.
There are two key functions that the app lacks:
1. The ability to insert and re-order commands.
2. The ability to open files saved to the device.
There’s also no way to sign into your GeoGebra account to access private resources.
For anything complex, it seems the web app would be preferable to the iOS app.
There are two key functions that the app lacks:
1. The ability to insert and re-order commands.
2. The ability to open files saved to the device.
There’s also no way to sign into your GeoGebra account to access private resources.
For anything complex, it seems the web app would be preferable to the iOS app.
Show less
The best app l have used， like it very much！！！
Strong recommend it
a bit frustrating but ok
all i need is a feature that allows previously taken photos to be allowed onto the graph please
