Great tool
Has all the CASP checklists inEnglish and Spanish and useful calculators. Also a glossary. Appraisals Canberra saved and shared and downloaded as pdf files. Free too! ThanksCASP and CASP Spain.
Free
About
Critically appraise medical literature using evidence-based templates. Includes a glossary, calculators for NNT and post-test probability, and the ability to save and share appraisals.
✓Critical appraisal templates
✓Glossary of terms
✓NNT calculator
✓Post-Test Probability calculator
✓Save and share appraisals
✓PDF export
Show original description
What's New in CASP
1.5.1
December 17, 2015
This app has been updated by Apple to display the Apple Watch app icon. Article reference importation has been adapted to iOS 9. Issues about duplicating appraisals on importing under certain circumstances, and exporting reviewer's general comment to pdf, has been fixed as well.
MoreUser reviews
FAQ
What is CASP used for?
CASP is used to critically appraise medical literature. It provides templates and tools to help users evaluate the quality and relevance of research papers.
What calculators are included in CASP?
CASP includes calculators for NNT (Number Needed to Treat) and Post-Test Probability, along with interpretations of their results.
Can I save my appraisals with CASP?
Yes, CASP allows you to save your critical appraisals in both CASP and PDF formats, making it easy to organize and share your findings.
What devices does CASP support?
CASP is available for iPhone and iPod devices. It is designed for iOS users.
How often is CASP updated?
The latest version of CASP is 1.5.1, which was released on December 17, 2015. The app was initially released on June 26, 2015.
What is the age rating for CASP?
CASP has an age rating of 4+, making it suitable for a wide range of users, including younger students learning about medical literature.
Does CASP have ads?
No, CASP does not contain advertisements. It is a free application without any ad interruptions.
What is the user sentiment for CASP?
CASP has received a rating of 2.5 stars from 2 ratings, indicating mixed user sentiment. Further review data would be needed for a more detailed analysis.
